Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search fdjslkfh
Advanced search
Cart
Join AIAA Institution Login
Skip main navigation
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics logo
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Paper

Removing Space Debris Through Sequential Captures and Ejections

Published Online:23 Apr 2013https://doi.org/10.2514/1.58768

Abstract

Low Earth orbit is overcluttered by rogue objects. Traditional satellite missions are not efficient enough to collect an appreciable amount of debris due to the high cost of orbit transfers. Many alternate proposals are politically controversial, costly, or dependent on further technological advances. This paper proposes an efficient mission structure and bespoke hardware to deorbit debris by capturing and ejecting them. These are executed through plastic interactions, and the momentum exchanges during capture and ejection assist the satellite in transferring to subsequent debris with substantial reduction in fuel requirements. The proposed hardware also exploits existing momentum to save fuel. Capturing debris at the ends of a spinning satellite, adjusting angular rate, and then simply letting go at a specified time provides a simple mechanism for redirecting the debris to an Earth-impacting trajectory or lower perigee. This paper provides analyses for orbit and hardware functionality and aspects of the control for debris collection.

References

  • [1] Kelso T., “Analysis of the Iridium 33-Cosmos 2251 Collision,” Advances of the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 135, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1099–1112; also AAS Paper  09-368. Google Scholar

  • [2] Pearson J., Carroll J., Levin E. and Oldson J., “Active Debris Removal: EDDE, the ElectroDynamic Debris Eliminator,” 61st International Astronautical, Prague, Czech Republic, Dec. 2009; also Paper  IAC-10-A6.4.9. Google Scholar

  • [3] Kushner D., “Cluttered Space,” Popular Science, Vol. 2, No. 8, Aug. 2010, pp. 60–64. PSCIEP Google Scholar

  • [4] Kessler D., “Collisional Cascading: The Limits of Population Growth in Low Earth Orbit,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 11, No. 12, 1991, pp. 63–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(91)90543-S ASRSDW 0273-1177 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Campbell J. W., Using Lasers in Space: Laser Orbital Debris Removal and Asteroid Deflection, Vol. 20, Center for Strategy and Technology, Air War College, Air University Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, 2000. Google Scholar

  • [6] Bekey I., “Project Orion: Orbital Debris Removal Using Ground-Based Sensors and Lasers,” Second European Conference on Space Debris, European Space Agency Paper  SP-393, 1997, p. 699. Google Scholar

  • [7] Bombardelli C. and Peláez J., “Ion Beam Shepherd for Contactless Space Debris Removal,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 34, No. 3, May–June 2011, pp. 916–920. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.51832 JGCDDT 0162-3192 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Carlson E., Casali S., Chambers D., Geissler G., Lalich A., Leipold M., Mach R., Parry J. and Weems F., “Final Design of a Space Debris Removal System,” NASA Tech. Rept.  CR-189976, 1990. Google Scholar

  • [9] Michaels D., “A Cosmic Question: How to Get Rid of All That Orbiting Space Junk?” European Space Agency Paper  SP-393, March 2009. Google Scholar

  • [10] Committee for the Assessment of NASA’s Orbital Debris Programs, Limiting Future Collision Risk to Spacecraft: An Assessment of NASA’s Meteoroid and Orbital Debris Programs, National Academic Press, Washington, D.C., 2011. Google Scholar

  • [11] Missel J. and Mortari D., “Sling Satellite for Debris Removal with Aggie Sweeper,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 140, No. 1, 2011, pp. 60–64; also AAS Paper  11-256. ADASA9 0065-3438 Google Scholar

  • [12] Missel J. and Mortari D., “Optimization of Debris Removal Path for TAMU Sweeper,” Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, Vol. 143, No. 1, 2012, pp. 935–945; also AAS Paper  12-167. ADASA9 0065-3438 Google Scholar

  • [13] Army Space Division, HQ TRADOC, “Space Environment and Orbital Mechanics,” Federation of American Scientists, Army Space Reference Text, Fort Monroe, VA, 2011, Chap. 5, http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/army/ref_text/chap5im.htm [accessed 2011]. Google Scholar

  • [14] Pearson J. and Yasaka T., “Tether-Assisted Disposal of Inoperative Satellites,” International Symposium on Space Technology and Science, Tokyo, Japan, 1990. Google Scholar

  • [15] Amend J. R., Brown E., Rodenberg N., Jaeger H. M. and Lipson H., “A Positive Pressure Universal Gripper Based on the Jamming of Granular Material,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 28, No. 2, April 2012, pp. 341–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/TRO.2011.2171093 IRAUEZ 1042-296X CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Zahl H. A. and Ziegler H. K., “Power Sources for Satellites and Space Vehicles,” Annals of the IGY, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1960, pp. 32–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(60)90047-5 Google Scholar

Previous article
Next article