Skip to main content
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Papers

Numerical Model for Molecular and Particulate Contamination Transport

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34158

A new model for simulating molecular and particulate contamination transport is described. This model is implemented in the Contamination Transport Simulation Program (CTSP). The code uses techniques found in rarefied gas and plasma dynamics codes and represents the contaminants as simulation macroparticles. This kinetic approach allows the code to consider external forces and interparticle interactions. Macroscopic properties such as contaminant plume partial pressure can also be computed. CTSP implements various contamination-specific material sources including a detailed model for molecular outgassing and a model for particulate detachment. The code is demonstrated with four examples focusing on mass transport between two parallel plates, computation of the steady-state equilibrium in a closed vessel, characterization of a test article outgassing rate from a quartz crystal microbalance measurement, and the use of purge gas to reduce the particulate fallout in atmospheric conditions. Simulation results are compared to analytical models.

References

  • [1] Colony J. A., “Ultraviolet Absorption of Common Spacecraft Contaminants,” NASA TM 80551, 1979. Google Scholar

  • [2] Tribble A., The Space Environment, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 2013, p. 31. Google Scholar

  • [3] Dever J. A., “Low Earth Orbital Atomic Oxygen and Ultraviolet Radiation Effects on Polymers,” NASA TM 103711, 1991. Google Scholar

  • [4] Stewart T., Arnold G. S., Hall D., Marvin D. C., Hwang W. C., Young Owl R. and Marven H. D., “Photochemical Spacecraft Self-Contamination: Laboratory Results and Systems Impacts,” Aerospace Corp. TR AD-A226 488, El Segundo, CA, 1990. Google Scholar

  • [5] Galica G. E., Green B. D., Boies M. T., Uy O. M., Silver D. M., Benson R. C., Erlandson R. E., Wood B. E. and Hall D. F., “Particle Environment Surrounding the Midcourse Space Experiment Spacecraft,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1999, pp. 561–565. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.27200 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [6] O'Dell S. L., Swartz D. A., Tice N. W., Plucinsky P. P., Grant C. E., Marshall H. L., Vikhlinin A. and Tennant A. F., “Modeling Contamination Migration on the Chandra X-Ray Observatory II,” Optical Engineering and Applications, International Soc. for Optics and Photonics, 2013, p. 88590F. Google Scholar

  • [7] Cauffman D., “Ionization and Attraction of Neutral Molecules to a Charged Spacecraft,” Aerospace Sciences Corp. Rept. SD-TR-80-78, El Segundo, CA, 1980. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Scialdone J. J., “Self Contamination and Environment of an Orbiting Spacecraft,” NASA TN D-6645, 1972. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Hastings D. and Garrett H., Spacecraft-Environment Interactions, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1996, pp. 167–177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Lai S., “Spherical-Shaped Ice Particle Production by Spraying Water in a Vacuum Chamber,” IEEE Transaction on Nuclear Science, Vol. 36, No. 6, 1989, pp. 2027–2032. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/23.45401 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Chang C. W., Kannenberg K. and Chidester M. H., “Development of Versatile Molecular Transport Model for Modeling Spacecraft Contamination,” Optical Systems Contamination: Effects, Measurements, and Control, Vol. 7794, International Soc. for Optics and Photonics, 2010. Google Scholar

  • [12] Rantanen R. and Gordon T., “Electrostatic Return of Contaminants,” NASA CR-2003-212637, 2003. Google Scholar

  • [13] Brieda L., Barrie A., Hughes D. and Errigo T., “Analysis of Particulate Contamination During Launch of the MMS Mission,” Optical System Contamination: Effects, Measurements, and Control, Vol. 7794, International Soc. for Optics and Photonics, 2010, Paper 77940. Google Scholar

  • [14] LeBeau G. and Lumpkin F. E., “Application Highlights of the DSMC Analysis Code (DAC) Software for Simulating Rarefied Flows,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 191, Nos. 6–7, 2001, pp. 595–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7825(01)00304-8 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] O'Sullivan C. and Guilbault G., “Commercial Quartz Crystal Microbalances—Theory and Applications,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, Vol. 14, Nos. 8–9, 1999, pp. 663–670. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5663(99)00040-8 BBIOE4 0956-5663 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Spektor R., Matlock T., Crofton M., Schoeffler D. and Brieda L., “Analytical Pumping Speed Models for Electric Propulsion Vacuum Facilities,” Proceedings of the Space Propulsion Conference, Asociation Aéronautique et Astronautique de France, 2018, p. 12. Google Scholar

  • [17] Bird G., Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows, Oxford Science Publ., Oxford, U.K., 1994. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Birdsall C. and Langdon A., Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation, Inst. of Physics Publ., Bristol, U.K., 2000. Google Scholar

  • [19] Koo J., “Hybrid PIC-MCC Computational Modeling of Hall Thrusters,” Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 2005. Google Scholar

  • [20] Shin H., Lee Y. and Jurng J., “Spherical-Shaped Ice Particle Production by Spraying Water in a Vacuum Chamber,” Applied Thermal Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2000, pp. 439–454. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(99)00035-6 ATENFT 1359-4311 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Woronowicz M. S., “Highlights of Transient Plume Impingement Model Validation and Applications,” 42nd AIAA Thermophysics Conference, AIAA Paper 2011-3772, June 2011. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Fang W., Shillor M., Stahel E., Epstein E., Ly C., Mcniel J. and Zaron E., “A Mathematical Model for Outgassing and Contamination,” SIAM Journal of Applied Math, Vol. 51, No. 5, 1991, pp. 1327–1355. doi:https://doi.org/10.1137/0151067 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] ASTM International, Standard Test Method for Contamination Outgassing Characteristics of Spacecraft Materials,” ASTM Paper  ASTM-E1559, West Conshohocken, PA, 2009, https://www.astm.org/Standards/E1559.htm. Google Scholar

  • [24] Crank J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed., Oxford Science Publ., Oxford, U.K., 1980, p. 32. Google Scholar

  • [25] Tribble A. C., Boyadjian B., Davis J., Haffner J. and McCullough E., “Contamination Control Engineering Design Guidelines for the Aerospace Community,” NASA CR 4740, 1996. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [26] IEST, Product Cleanliness Levels—Applications, Requirements, and Determination,” IEST-STD-CC1246D, Inst. of Environmental Sciences and Technology, Schaumburg, IL, 2002, http://www.iest.org/Standards-RPs/Recommended-Practices/IEST-STD-CC1246. Google Scholar

  • [27] Raab J., “Particulate Contamination Effects on Solar Cell Performance,” Martin Marietta Aerospace Rept.  MCR-86-2005, 1986. Google Scholar

  • [28] Ma P., Fong M. and Lee A., “Surface Particle Obscuration and BRDF Predictions,” Scatter from Optical Components, Vol. 1165, International Soc. for Optics and Photonics, 1989, pp. 381–391. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.962866 Google Scholar

  • [29] Perry R., “A Numerical Evaluation of the Correlation of Surface Cleanliness Level and Percent Area Coverage,” Optics and Photonics, International Soc. for Optics and Photonics, 2006. Google Scholar

  • [30] Klavins A. and Lee A., “Spacecraft Particulate Contaminant Redistribution,” Proceedings of SPIE 0777, Optical System Contamination: Effects, Measurement, Control, Jan. 1987. doi:https://doi.org/10.1117/12.967084 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] White F., Viscous Fluid Flow, McGraw–Hill, New York, 1991, p. 182. Google Scholar

  • [32] Brieda L., “Numerical Investigation of Chamber Repressurization,” NASA Goddard Contamination, Coatings, Materials, and Planetary Protection Workshop [CD-ROM], NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt MD, 2017. Google Scholar

  • [33] Greenwood J., “The Correct and Incorrect Generation of Cosine Distribution of Scattered Particles for Monte-Carlo Modelling of Vacuum Systems,” Vacuum, Vol. 67, No. 2, 2002, pp. 217–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-207X(02)00173-2 VACUAV 0042-207X CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Howell J., Menguc M. P. and Siegel R., Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015, http://www.thermalradiation.net/sectionc/C-11.html. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [35] O'Hanlon J., User’s Guide to Vacuum Technology, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2003, pp. 27–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36] ASTM International, Standard Practice for Spacecraft Hardware Thermal Vacuum Bakeout,” ASTM Paper  ASTM-E2900, West Conshohocken, PA, 2012, https://www.astm.org/Standards/E2900.htm. Google Scholar

  • [37] Jasak H., Jemcov A. and Tukovic Z., “OpenFOAM: A C++ Library for Complex Physics Simulations,” Proceedings of the International Workshop on Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2007. Google Scholar