Skip to main content
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Papers

Roughness-Induced Crossflow-Type Instabilities in a Hypersonic Capsule Boundary Layer Including Nonequilibrium

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34404

The current study investigates the unsteady disturbance development in a three-dimensional, high-enthalpy boundary layer on a capsule-like hemispherical geometry with pseudo-random distributed roughness. Direct Numerical Simulations are conducted for a typical reentry scenario at M=20 where chemical dissociation takes place. Unsteady disturbances at various frequencies are introduced into the flow to analyze the instabilities developing in the wake of the roughness patch. The amplification of small disturbances is shown for various chemical models (i.e., chemical equilibrium, chemical nonequilibrium, and thermochemical nonequilibrium). The largest disturbance amplification is observed for a crossflow-type vortex developing in the wake of the highest skewed protuberance of the roughness patch. The modes of instability of this crossflow-type vortex are analyzed and compared for different frequencies. The influence of the different nonequilibrium effects on the steady base flow as well as on the disturbance development is quantified and compared. The study highlights the necessity to include nonequilibrium effects in transitional scenarios as the unsteady development of the instabilities are affected strongly by the chemical modeling.

References

  • [1] Morkovin M., “Bypass Transition to Turbulence and Research Desiderata,” Transition in Turbines, NASA CP-2386, 1984, pp. 161–199. Google Scholar

  • [2] Theiss A., Ali S. R., Hein S., Heitmann D. and Radespiel R., “Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Laminar-Turbulent Boundary Layer Transition on a Blunt Generic Re-Entry Capsule,” AIAA Paper 2014-2353, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-2353 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Hein S., Theiss A., Di Giovanni A., Stemmer C., Schilden T., Schröder W., Paredes P., Choudhari M. M., Li F., Reshotko E. and et al., “Numerical Investigation of Roughness Effects on Transition on Spherical Capsules,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2019. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34247 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Schneider S. P., “Summary of Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Transition Experiments on Blunt Bodies with Roughness,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1090–1105. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.37431 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Malik M. R. and Anderson E. C., “Real Gas Effects on Hypersonic Boundary Layer Stability,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 3, No. 5, 1991, pp. 803–821. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858012 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Berger K. T., “Aerothermodynamic Testing of the Crew Exploration Vehicle at Mach 6 and Mach 10,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 46, No. 4, 2009, pp. 758–765. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39247 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Hollis B. R., “Distributed Roughness Effects on Blunt-Body Transition and Turbulent Heating,” AIAA Paper 2014-0238, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0238 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Hollis B. R., “Experimental Investigation of Roughness Effects on Transition Onset and Turbulent Heating Augmentation on a Hemisphere at Mach 6 and Mach 10,” NASA TM-2017-219613, 2017. Google Scholar

  • [9] Reda D. C., “Review and Synthesis of Roughness-Dominated Transition Correlations for Reentry Applications,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2002, pp. 161–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3803 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Reda D. C., Wilder M. C., Bogdanoff D. W. and Prabhu D. K., “Transition Experiments on Blunt Bodies with Distributed Roughness in Hypersonic Free Flight,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2008, pp. 210–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.30288 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Ali S. R., Radespiel R. and Theiss A., “Transition Experiment with a Blunt Apollo Shape Like Capsule in Hypersonic Ludwieg Tube,” 63. Deutscher Luft-und Raumfahrtkongress 2014, Paper 2014-340270, DGLR, Bonn, 2014. Google Scholar

  • [12] Radespiel R., Ali S. R. C., Muoz F., Bowersox R., Leidy A., Tanno H., Kirk L. C. and Reshotko E., “Experimental Investigation of Roughness Effects on Transition on Blunt Spherical Capsule Shapes,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34295 JSCRAG 0022-4650 Google Scholar

  • [13] Marineau E. C., Laurence S. J. and Hornung H. G., “Apollo-Shaped Capsule Boundary Layer Transition at High-Enthalpy in T5,” AIAA Paper 2010-0446, 2010. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-446 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Tanno H., Kodera M., Komuro T., Sato K., Takahashi M. and Itoh K., “Aeroheating Measurements on a Reentry Capsule Model in Free-Piston Shock Tunnel HIEST,” AIAA Paper 2010-1181, 2010. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-1181 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Tanno H., Sato K., Komuro T. and Itoh K., “Free-Flight Aerodynamic Test of Reentry Vehicles in High-Temperature Real-Gas Flow,” AIAA Paper 2014-3109, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-3109 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Olejniczak J., Wright M. J., Laurence S. and Hornung H. G., “Computational Modeling of T5 Laminar and Turbulent Heating Data on Blunt Cones, Part 1: Titan Application,” AIAA Paper 2005-0176, 2005. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-176 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Chang C.-L., Choudhari M., Venkatachari B. S. and Li F., “Effects of Cavities and Protuberances on Transition over Hypersonic Vehicles,” AIAA Paper 2011-3245, 2011. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3245 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Theiss A., Hein S., Ali S. R. C. and Radespiel R., “Wake Flow Instability Studies Behind Discrete Roughness Elements on a Generic Re-Entry Capsule,” AIAA Paper 2016-4382, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-4382 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Theiss A., Leyh S. and Hein S., “Pressure Gradient Effects on Wake Flow Instabilities Behind Isolated Roughness Elements on Re-Entry Capsules,” 7th European Conference for Aeronautics and Aerospace Sciences, EUCASS, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.13009/EUCASS2017-594 Google Scholar

  • [20] De Tullio N., Paredes P., Sandham N. and Theofilis V., “Laminar Turbulent Transition Induced by a Discrete Roughness Element in a Supersonic Boundary Layer,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 735, 2013, pp. 613–646. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2013.520 JFLSA7 0022-1120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Hudson M. L., Chokani N. and Candler G., “Linear Stability of Hypersonic Flow in Thermochemical Nonequilibrium,” AIAA Paper 1996-0671, 1996. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.204 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Hudson M. L., “Linear Stability of Hypersonic Flow in Thermal and Chemical Nonequilibrium,” Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, North Carolina, 1996. Google Scholar

  • [23] Chang C.-L., Vinh H. and Malik M., “Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Stability with Chemical Reactions Using PSE,” 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Fluid Dynamics and Co-Located Conferences, AIAA Paper 1997-2012, 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-2012 Google Scholar

  • [24] Stemmer C., Birrer M. and Adams N. A., “Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Flow with an Obstacle in Thermochemical Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2017, pp. 899–915. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A32984 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Stemmer C., Birrer M. and Adams N. A., “Disturbance Development in an Obstacle Wake in a Reacting Hypersonic Boundary Layer,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 54, No. 4, 2017, pp. 945–960. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33708 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Johnson H. B., Seipp T. G. and Candler G. V., “Numerical Study of Hypersonic Reacting Boundary Layer Transition on Cones,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 10, No. 10, 1998, pp. 2676–2685. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869781 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Malik M. R., “Disturbance Development in an Obstacle Wake in a Reacting Hypersonic Boundary Layer,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2003, pp. 332–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3968 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Johnson H. B. and Candler G. V., “Hypersonic Boundary Layer Stability Analysis Using PSE-Chem,” AIAA Paper 2005-5023, 2005. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-5023 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Mortensen C. H. and Zhong X., “Real-Gas and Surface-Ablation Effects on Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Instability over a Blunt Cone,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 54, No. 3, 2016, pp. 980–998. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054404 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Stemmer C. and Fehn J., “High-Temperature Gas Effects at a Capsule Under Re-Entry and Wind-Tunnel Conditions,” AIAA Paper 2014-2645, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-2645 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Di Giovanni A. and Stemmer C., “Numerical Simulations of the High-Enthalpy Boundary Layer on a Generic Capsule Geometry with Roughness,” New Results in Numerical and Experimental Fluid Mechanics XI, STAB/DGLR Symposium, Springer, 2017, pp. 189–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64519-3_17 Google Scholar

  • [32] Di Giovanni A. and Stemmer C., “Crossflow-Type Breakdown Induced by Distributed Roughness in the Boundary Layer of a Hypersonic Capsule Configuration,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 856, 2018, pp. 470–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2018.706 JFLSA7 0022-1120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Schneider S. P., “Effects of Roughness on Hypersonic Boundary-Layer Transition,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 45, No. 2, 2008, pp. 193–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.29713 JSCRAG 0022-4650 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Van den Eynde J. P. J. P. and Sandham N. D., “Numerical Simulations of Transition due to Isolated Roughness Elements at Mach 6,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2016, pp. 53–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054139 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [35] Park C., “A Review of Reaction Rates in High Temperature Air,” AIAA Paper 1989-1740, 1989. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1989-1740 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Anderson J. D., Hypersonic and High-Temperature Gas Dynamics, AIAA Education Series, AIAA, Reston, VA, Oct. 2006. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/4.861956 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [37] Blottner F. G., Johnson M. and Ellis M., “Chemically Reacting Viscous Flow Program for Multi-Component Gas Mixtures,” Sandia National Lab. TR SC- RR-70-754, 1971. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [38] Hirschfelder J. O., Curtiss C. F. and Bird R. A., Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids, Wiley, New York, 1954, p. 539. Google Scholar

  • [39] Wilke C., “A Viscosity Equation for Gas Mixtures,” Journal of Chemical Physics, Vol. 18, No. 4, 1950, pp. 517–519. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1747673 JCPSA6 0021-9606 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Park C., “Stagnation-Point Radiation for Apollo 4,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2004, pp. 349–357. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6527 JTHTEO 0887-8722 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Muppidi S. and Mahesh K., “Direct Numerical Simulations of Roughness-Induced Transition in Supersonic Boundary Layers,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 693, 2012, pp. 28–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2011.417 JFLSA7 0022-1120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [42] Groskopf G. and Kloker M. J., “Instability and Transition Mechanisms Induced by Skewed Roughness Elements in a High-Speed Laminar Boundary Layer,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 805, 2016, pp. 262–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2016.563 JFLSA7 0022-1120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [43] Vos J., Duquesne N. and Lee H., “Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interaction Studies Using the NSMB Flow Solver,” Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space and Vehicles, ESA SP-426, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 1999, pp. 229–236. Google Scholar

  • [44] Hoarau Y., Pena D., Vos J. B., Charbonier D., Gehri A., Braza M., Deloze T. and Laurendeau E., “Recent Developments of the Navier Stokes Multi Block (NSMB) CFD Solver,” AIAA Paper 2016-2056, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-2056 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [45] Von Kaenel R., Sanchi S., Vos J., Gaffuri M., Leyland P., Walloschek T. and Binetti P., “IXV CFD Simulations for Wind Tunnel Rebuilding and Extrapolation to Flight,” Proceedings of the 6th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics for Space Vehicles, ESA SP-659, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 2009. Google Scholar

  • [46] Goebel F., Vos J. and Mundt C., “CFD Simulation of the FIRE II Flight Experiment,” AIAA Paper 2012-3350, 2012. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-3350 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [47] Di Giovanni A. and Stemmer C., “Direct Numerical Simulations of Roughness-Induced Transition in the Boundary Layer of a Hypersonic Spherical Forebody Under Consideration of High-Temperature Gas Effects,” AIAA Paper 2018-4046, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4046 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [48] Malik M. R., Li F., Choudhari M. M. and Chang C.-L., “Secondary Instability of Crossflow Vortices and Swept-Wing Boundary-Layer Transition,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 399, 1999, pp. 85–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112099006291 JFLSA7 0022-1120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [49] Wassermann P. and Kloker M., “Transition Mechanisms Induced by Travelling Crossflow Vortices in a Three-Dimensional Boundary Layer,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 483, 2003, pp. 67–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112003003884 JFLSA7 0022-1120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [50] White E. B. and Saric W. S., “Secondary Instability of Crossflow Vortices,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 525, 2005, pp. 275–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211200400268X JFLSA7 0022-1120 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [51] Chou A., King A. and Kegerise M. A., “Transition Induced by Tandem Rectangular Roughness Elements on a Supersonic Flat Plate,” AIAA Paper 2018-3531, 2018. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-3531 LinkGoogle Scholar