Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search fdjslkfh
Advanced search
Cart
Join AIAA Institution Login
Skip main navigationClose Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets logo
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Papers

Low-Earth-Orbit Constellation Phasing Using Miniaturized Low-Thrust Propulsion Systems

Published Online:1 Jan 2021https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34905

Abstract

Many low-Earth-orbit constellations consist of multiple small satellites that are launched together in batches, and which make use of differential atmospheric drag for subsequent deployment and phasing. Depending on the initial altitude, this process can potentially take many months, or even years, to complete, and satellite altitudes can only ever be decreased, potentially affecting mission lifetimes. Miniaturized low-thrust propulsion systems are one option to achieve faster phasing and can additionally increase the constellation lifetime through drag compensation. Here, an analytical and numerical study comparing differential drag and low-thrust propulsion for constellation phasing is performed. Satellite electrical constraints associated with power generation and battery cycling life represent important factors that can decrease the performance of an onboard propulsion system. Despite these constraints, low-thrust propulsion can reduce total phasing times by an order of magnitude, or more, for altitudes in the range 300–700 km, while also increasing satellite flexibility and introducing a number of operational advantages. Remaining propellant can be used for drag compensation and collision avoidance maneuvers, while also reducing deorbiting times by many years.

References

  • [1] Villela T., Costa C. A., Brandão A. M., Bueno F. T. and Leonardi R., “Towards the Thousandth CubeSat: A Statistical Overview,” International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 2019, Jan. 2019, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5063145 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Woellert K., Ehrenfreund P., Ricco A. J. and Hertzfeld H., “CubeSats: Cost-Effective Science and Technology Platforms for Emerging and Developing Nations,” Advances in Space Research, Vol. 47, No. 4, 2011, pp. 663–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.10.009 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Selva D. and Krejci D., “A Survey and Assessment of the Capabilities of CubeSats for Earth Observation,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 74, May 2012, pp. 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.12.014 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Leonard C. L., Hollister W. M. and Bergmann E. V., “Orbital Formationkeeping with Differential Drag,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 1989, pp. 108–113. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20374 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Mishne D., “Formation Control of Satellites Subject to Drag Variations and J2 Perturbations,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2004, pp. 685–692. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.11156 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Gangestad J., Hardy B. and Hinkley D., “Operations, Orbit Determination, and Formation Control of the AeroCube-4 CubeSats,” 27th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Paper SSC13-X-4, Aug. 2013. Google Scholar

  • [7] Finley T., Rose D., Nave K., Wells W., Redfern J., Rose R. and Ruf C., “Techniques for LEO Constellation Deployment and Phasing Utilizing Differential Aerodynamic Drag,” AAS/AIAA Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, Vol. 150, Univelt Inc., Escondido, CA, 2013, pp. 1397–1411. Google Scholar

  • [8] Bussy-Virat C. D., Ridley A. J., Masher A., Nave K. and Intelisano M., “Assessment of the Differential Drag Maneuver Operations on the CYGNSS Constellation,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2019, pp. 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2878158 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Foster C., Mason J., Vittaldev V., Leung L., Beukelaers V., Stepan L. and Zimmerman R., “Constellation Phasing with Differential Drag on Planet Labs Satellites,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2018, pp. 473–483. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33927 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Edelbaum T. N., “Propulsion Requirements for Controllable Satellites,” ARS Journal, Vol. 31, No. 8, 1961, pp. 1079–1089. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.5723 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Pollard J. E., “Simplified Analysis of Low-Thrust Optimal Maneuvers,” Aerospace Corp. TR-2000 (8565)-10, El Segundo, CA, 2000, pp. 1–39. Google Scholar

  • [12] Taheri E., Zidek R. A., Kolmanovsky I. and Girard A., “On Satellite Orbit Decay Compensation in Low Earth Orbits,” 2018 Space Flight Mechanics Meeting, AIAA Paper 2018-2226, Jan. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-2226 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Blandino J. J., Martinez-Baquero N., Demetriou M. A., Gatsonis N. A. and Paschalidis N., “Feasibility for Orbital Life Extension of a CubeSat in the Lower Thermosphere,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 53, No. 5, 2016, pp. 864–875. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33462 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Moorthy A. K., Blandino J., Gatsonis N. and Demetriou M. A., “Orbit Maintenance and Attitude Control for a CubeSat Flying in the Lower Thermosphere,” 2018 AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and Exposition, AIAA Paper 2018-5404, Sept. 2018. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-5404 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Kvell U., Puusepp M., Mainski F., Past J. E., Palmer K., Grönland T. A. and Noorma M., “Nanosatellite Orbit Control Using MEMS Cold Gas Thrusters,” Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2014, p. 279. https://doi.org/10.3176/proc.2014.2S.09 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Jenkins M. G., Krejci D. and Lozano P., “CubeSat Constellation Management Using Ionic Liquid Electrospray Propulsion,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 151, Oct. 2018, pp. 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.06.007 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Haque S. E., Keidar M. and Lee T., “Low-Thrust Orbital Maneuver Analysis for CubeSat Spacecraft with a Micro-Cathode Arc Thruster Subsystem,” 33rd International Electric Propulsion Conference, Electric Rocket Propulsion Soc., Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 1–13; also Paper IEPC-2013-365, 2013, http://erps.spacegrant.org/. Google Scholar

  • [18] McGrath C., “Analytical Methods for Satellite Constellation Reconfiguration and Reconnaissance Using Low-Thrust Manoeuvres,” Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, U.K., 2018. Google Scholar

  • [19] Morton B., Withrow-Maser S. and Pernicka H., “On-Orbit CubeSat Performance Validation of a Multi-Mode Micropropulsion System,” 31st Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Paper SSC17-VIII-4, June 2017. Google Scholar

  • [20] Hudson J., Spangelo S., Hine A., Kolosa D. and Lemmer K., “Mission Analysis for CubeSats with Micropropulsion,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 53, No. 5, 2016, pp. 836–846. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33564 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Kolosa D., Spangelo S. C., Lemmer K. M. and Hudson J., “Mission Analysis for a Micro RF Ion Thruster for CubeSat Orbital Maneuvers,” 50th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA Paper 2014-3908, July 2014. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-3908 Google Scholar

  • [22] Hudson J., Lemmer K. and Hine A., “Integration of Micro Electric Propulsion System for CubeSat Orbital Maneuvers,” AIAA SPACE 2015 Conference and Exposition, AIAA Paper 2015-4669, Aug. 2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-4669 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Edlerman E. and Kronhaus I., “Analysis of Nanosatellite Formation Establishment and Maintenance Using Electric Propulsion,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 54, No. 3, 2017, pp. 731–742. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33632 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Kronhaus I. and Schilling K., “Pico-Satellite Orbit and Attitude Control by Electric Propulsion,” IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 46, No. 19, 2013, pp. 277–282. https://doi.org/10.3182/20130902-5-DE-2040.00045 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Dono A., Plice L., Mueting J., Conn T. and Ho M., “Propulsion Trade Studies for Spacecraft Swarm Mission Design,” 2018 IEEE Aerospace Conference, IEEE, New York, 2018, pp. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2018.8396492 Google Scholar

  • [26] El Mabsout B., Claudé P. and Dudeck M., “Rendezvous of a Continuous Low-Thrust CubeSat with a Satellite,” Journal of Physics Communications, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2019, Paper 055014. https://doi.org/10.1088/2399-6528/ab0015 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Sprague C. I., “Modelling and Simulation of Autonomous CubeSats for Orbital Debris Mitigation,” 6th International Conference on Astrodynamics Tools and Techniques, European Space Agency, 2016. Google Scholar

  • [28] Hakima H. and Reza Emami M., “Concurrent Attitude and Orbit Control for Deorbiter CubeSats,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 97, Feb. 2020, Paper 105616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105616 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Zhang K., Gatsonis N. A., Blandino J. J. and Demetriou M. A., “Nanosat Orbit Raising and Rendezvous Using a Continuous-Thrust Controller,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2017-0163, Jan. 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0163 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Gatsonis N. A., Lu Y., Blandino J., Demetriou M. A. and Paschalidis N., “Micropulsed Plasma Thrusters for Attitude Control of a Low-Earth-Orbiting CubeSat,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2016, pp. 57–73. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33345 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Gonzalo Gomez J. L., Colombo C. and Di Lizia P., “A Semi-Analytical Approach to Low-Thrust Collision Avoidance Manoeuvre Design,” 70th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2019), International Astronautical Federation, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2019, pp. 1–9. Google Scholar

  • [32] McGrath C., Kerr E. and Macdonald M., “An Analytical, Low-Cost Deployment Strategy for Satellite Constellations,” Proceedings of the 13th Reinventing Space Conference, Springer International Publ., Oxford, England, U.K., 2018, pp. 107–116; also Paper BIS-RS-2015-45, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32817-1_11 Google Scholar

  • [33] Shang H., Wang S. and Wu W., “Design and Optimization of Low-Thrust Orbital Phasing Maneuver,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 42, April 2015, pp. 365–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.02.003 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Martínez J., Rafalskyi D., Zorzoli Rossi E. and Aanesland A., “Development, Qualification and First Flight Data of the Iodine Based Cold Gas Thruster for CubeSats,” 5th IAA Conference on University Satellite Missions and CubeSat Workshop, Group of Astrodynamics for the Use of Space Systems, International Academy of Astronautics, 2020. Google Scholar

  • [35] Anon., “NanoProp 6U,” Datasheet, GomSpace, https://gomspace.com/UserFiles/Subsystems/flyer/gomspace_nanoprop_cgp6_flyer.pdf [retrieved 6 May 2020]. Google Scholar

  • [36] Anon., “Propulsion Unit for CubeSats,” Datasheet 11044000-01, VACCO, https://www.vacco.com/images/uploads/pdfs/11044000-01_PUC.pdf [retrieved 6 May 2020]. Google Scholar

  • [37] Anon., “Comet Water-Based Propulsion for Small Satellites,” Datasheet, Bradford Space, https://www.bradford-space.com/assets/pdf/be_datasheet_comet_2019oct.pdf [retrieved 21 May 2020]. Google Scholar

  • [38] Martinez J., Rafalskyi D. and Aanesland A., “Development and Testing of the NPT30-I2 Iodine Ion Thruster,” 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Electric Rocket Propulsion Soc., Vienna, 2019, pp. 1–11; also IEPC-2019-811, 2019, http://erps.spacegrant.org/. Google Scholar

  • [39] Gurciullo A., Jarrige J., Lascombes P. and Packan D., “Experimental Performance and Plume Characterisation of a Miniaturised 50W Hall Thruster,” 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Electric Rocket Propulsion Soc., Vienna, 2019, pp. 1–13; also IEPC-2019-142, 2019, http://erps.spacegrant.org/. Google Scholar

  • [40] Foust J., “Accion Systems Raises $11 Million Series B for Space Propulsion,” SpaceNews, Feb. 2020, https://spacenews.com/accion-systems-raises-11-million-series-b-for-space-propulsion/ [retrieved 6 May 2020]. Google Scholar

  • [41] Umair Siddiqui M. and Cretel C., “Updated Performance Measurements and Analysis of the Phase Four RF Thruster,” 2018 Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA Paper 2018-4817, July 2018. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4817 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [42] Schönherr T., Little B., Krejci D., Reissner A. and Seifert B., “Development, Production, and Testing of the IFM Nano FEEP Thruster,” 36th International Electric Propulsion Conference, Electric Rocket Propulsion Soc., Vienna, 2019, pp. 1–11; also IEPC-2019-362, 2019, http://erps.spacegrant.org/. Google Scholar

  • [43] Lemmer K., “Propulsion for CubeSats,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 134, May 2017, pp. 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.048 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [44] Bonin G., Roth N., Armitage S., Newman J., Risi B. and Zee R. E., “CanX-4 and CanX-5 Precision Formation Flight: Mission Accomplished!” 29th AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Paper SSC15-I-4, July 2015. Google Scholar

  • [45] Werner D., “Thrustme, SpaceTy Report Initial Success of Cold Gas Thruster,” SpaceNews, Nov. 2019, https://spacenews.com/spacety-thrustme-cold-gas-test/ [retrieved 6 May 2020]. Google Scholar

  • [46] Krejci D., Reissner A., Seifert B., Jelem D., Hörbe T., Plesescu F., Friedhoff P. and Lai S., “Demonstration of the IFM Nano FEEP Thruster in Low Earth Orbit,” 4S Symposium 2018, European Space Agency, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, 2018. Google Scholar

  • [47] Sternberg D., Essmiller J., Colley C., Klesh A. and Krajewski J., “Attitude Control System for the Mars Cube One Spacecraft,” 2019 IEEE Aerospace Conference, IEEE, New York, 2019, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2019.8741816 Google Scholar

  • [48] Klesh A., Clement B., Colley C., Essmiller J., Forgette D., Krajewski J., Marinan A., Martin-Mur T., Steinkraus J., Sternberg D., Werne T. and Young B., “MarCO: Early Operations of the First CubeSats to Mars,” 32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Paper SSC18-WKIX-04, 2018. Google Scholar

  • [49] Chung S.-J., Bandyopadhyay S., Foust R., Subramanian G. P. and Hadaegh F. Y., “Review of Formation Flying and Constellation Missions Using Nanosatellites,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2016, pp. 567–578. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33291 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [50] Qu Z., Zhang G., Cao H. and Xie J., “LEO Satellite Constellation for Internet of Things,” IEEE Access, Vol. 5, Aug. 2017, pp. 18391–18401. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2735988 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [51] Larson W. J. and Wertz J. R., “Orbit and Constellation Design,” Space Mission Analysis and Design, 3rd ed., Microcosm Press, El Segundo, CA, 1999, Chap. 7. Google Scholar

  • [52] Guo J. and Han C., “Where Is the Limit: The Analysis of CubeSat ADCS Performance,” 4S Symposium 2016, European Space Agency and the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, 2016, pp. 1–15. Google Scholar

  • [53] Xia X., Sun G., Zhang K., Wu S., Wang T., Xia L. and Liu S., “NanoSats/CubeSats ACDS Survey,” 2017 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 2017, pp. 515–5158. https://doi.org/10.1109/CCDC.2017.7979410 Google Scholar

  • [54] Anon., “General Mission Analysis Tool (GMAT), Version R2018a,” NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, https://software.nasa.gov/software/GSC-18094-1 [retrieved 20 April 2020]. Google Scholar

  • [55] Anon., “Semi-Analytic Tool for End of Life Analysis (STELA), Version V3.3,” Centre National d’Études Spatiales (CNES), https://logiciels.cnes.fr/en/node/37?type=desc [retrieved 2 July 2020]. Google Scholar

  • [56] Patel M. R., “Energy Balance and Power Management,” Spacecraft Power Systems, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2004, Chap. C. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [57] Anon., “XTE-SF (Standard Fluence) Space Qualified Triple Junction Solar Cell,” Datasheet, Spectrolab, https://www.spectrolab.com/photovoltaics/XTE-SF Data Sheet_12.23.19.pdf [retrieved 12 May 2020]. Google Scholar

  • [58] Broussely M., Herreyre S., Biensan P., Kasztejna P., Nechev K. and Staniewicz R. J., “Aging Mechanism in Li Ion Cells and Calendar Life Predictions,” Journal of Power Sources, Vols. 97–98, July 2001, pp. 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00722-4 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [59] Barré A., Deguilhem B., Grolleau S., Gérard M., Suard F. and Riu D., “A Review on Lithium-Ion Battery Ageing Mechanisms and Estimations for Automotive Applications,” Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 241, Nov. 2013, pp. 680–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.040 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [60] Lee J.-W., Anguchamy Y. K. and Popov B. N., “Simulation of Charge–Discharge Cycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries Under Low-Earth-Orbit Conditions,” Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 162, No. 2, 2006, pp. 1395–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2006.07.045 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [61] Navarathinam N., Lee R. and Chesser H., “Characterization of Lithium-Polymer Batteries for CubeSat Applications,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 68, Nos. 11–12, 2011, pp. 1752–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.02.004 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [62] Wang X., Sone Y. and Kuwajima S., “Effect of Operation Conditions on Simulated Low-Earth Orbit Cycle-Life Testing of Commercial Lithium-Ion Polymer Cells,” Journal of Power Sources, Vol. 142, Nos. 1–2, 2005, pp. 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.10.014 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [63] Sutton G. P. and Biblarz O., “Liquid Propellant Rocket Engine Fundamentals,” Rocket Propulsion Elements, 7th ed., Wiley, New York, 2001, Chap. 6. Google Scholar

  • [64] Chobotov V. A., “Orbital Systems,” Orbital Mechanics, 3rd ed., AIAA Education Series, AIAA, Reston, VA, 2002, Chap. 11. LinkGoogle Scholar

Previous article
Next article