Skip to main content
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Papers

Eddy-Current Actuator for Attraction and Repulsion of Non-Ferromagnetic, Conductive Spacecraft

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A35466

This paper introduces a propellant-free approach to mobility of an inspection or servicing vehicle. The approach is suitable for motion near the surface of non-ferromagnetic, conductive objects in orbit. This work considers the specifics of eddy-current interactions between a translating permanent magnet and the aluminum surfaces of spacecraft. Such an actuator moves within the body of an inspection vehicle, requiring that its motion remains limited if the vehicle is to continuously interact with the client spacecraft. Experimental verification on a low-friction air track verifies a model for attraction–repulsion dynamics at millimeter-scale initial separations in one dimension. Results show good agreement between the simulated and tested conditions and motivate extension of the model to more general cases. To bound the design space and relative distances at which this actuator is effective, this work identifies the required size, mass, and trajectories for repulsion that restores the actuator to its initial configuration. Results support the utility of eddy-current actuation for microsatellites at separations of millimeters to centimeters from their conductive clients. For such clients the actuator may enable relative mobility and achieve other objectives key to proximity operations.

References

  • [1] Fredrickson S., Duran S., Braun A., Straube T. and Mitchell J., “AERCam Autonomy: Intelligent Software Architecture for Robotic Free Flying Nanosatellite Inspection Vehicles,” AIAA Paper 2006-7392, Sept. 2006. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2006-7392 Google Scholar

  • [2] Banker B. and Askew S., “Seeker 1.0: Prototype Robotic Free Flying Inspector Mission Overview,” Small Satellite Conference, Utah State Univ. Paper SSC19-XI-04, Logan, UT, Aug. 2019. Google Scholar

  • [3] Stevenson D. and Schaub H., “Electrostatic Spacecraft Rate and Attitude Control—Experimental Results and Performance Considerations,” Acta Astronautica, Vol. 119, Feb. 2016, pp. 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2015.10.023 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Youngquist R. C., Nurge M. A. and Wilson K. T., “Mathematical Model Development and Experimental Verification of Electromagnetic Force Actuators for Use in Space Applications,” NASA TR 20210010505, March 2021. Google Scholar

  • [5] Thompson M. T., “Electrodynamic Magnetic Suspension—Models, Scaling Laws, and Experimental Results,” IEEE Transactions on Education, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2000, pp. 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1109/13.865211 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Fujii N., Hayashi G. and Sakamoto Y., “Characteristics of Magnetic Lift, Propulsion and Guidance by Using Magnet Wheels with Rotating Permanent Magnets,” Conference Record of the 2000 IEEE Industry Applications Conference, IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, Oct. 2000, pp. 257–262.https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.2000.881111 Google Scholar

  • [7] Reinhardt B. Z. and Peck M. A., “New Electromagnetic Actuator for On-Orbit Inspection,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2016, pp. 241–248. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33320 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Dalton D. K., Tabor G. F., Hermans T. and Abbott J. J., “Attracting Conductive Nonmagnetic Objects with Rotating Magnetic Dipole Fields,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2022, pp. 11,484–11,491. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3194878 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Sodano H. A., Bae J., Inman D. J. and Belvin W. K., “Concept and Model of Eddy Current Damper for Vibration Suppression of a Beam,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 288, Nos. 4–5, 2005, pp. 1177–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2005.01.016 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Sodano H. A., Bae J.-S., Inman D. J. and Belvin W. K., “Improved Concept and Model of Eddy Current Damper,” Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, Vol. 128, No. 3, 2006, pp. 294–302. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2172256 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Reinhardt B., Hencey B. and Peck M., “Characterization of Eddy Currents for Space Actuation,” AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AIAA Paper 2012-4868, Aug. 2012. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-4868 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Wilson K. T., Bernal G. and Peck M. A., “A Translating Eddy-Current Actuator for Relative Positioning of Spacecraft,” AIAA Paper 2022-2386, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-2386 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Pham L. N., Tabor G. F., Pourkand A., Aman J. L. B., Hermans T. and Abbott J. J., “Dexterous Magnetic Manipulation of Conductive Non-Magnetic Objects,” Nature, Vol. 598, No. 7881, 2021, pp. 439–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03966-6 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Wilson K. T. and Peck M. A., “Electromagnetic Actuation for Non-Contact, Propellant-Free, Six-Degree-of-Freedom Relative Mobility,” AIAA Paper 2021-0074, Jan. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-0074 Google Scholar

  • [15] Simpson J. C., Lane J. E., Immer C. D. and Youngquist R. C., “Simple Analytic Expressions for the Magnetic Field of a Circular Current Loop,” NASA TM-2013-217919, Jan. 2001. Google Scholar

  • [16] Bernal G., “Low Friction Demonstrator for Magnetic Actuation of Spacecraft,” IEEE MIT Undergraduate Research Technology Conference, Oct. 2022, pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/URTC54388.2021.9701638 Google Scholar

  • [17] NASA’s Implementation Plan for International Space Station Continuing Flight, Vol. 2, Rev. 2., NASA International Space Station Program, Houston, TX, 2005, p. 33. Google Scholar

  • [18] MATLAB, Software Package, Rev. 2022a, MathWorks, Natick, MA, 2022. Google Scholar

  • [19] Simulink, Software Package, Rev. 2022a, Ver. 9.5, MathWorks, Natick, MA, 2022. Google Scholar

  • [20] Dempsey R. (ed.), “The International Space Station: Operating an Outpost in the New Frontier,” NASA SP-2017-634, 2018. Google Scholar

  • [21] Hill G. W., “Researches in the Lunar Theory,” American Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1878, pp. 5–26. https://doi.org/10.2307/2369430 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Clohessy W. H. and Wiltshire R. S., “Terminal Guidance System for Satellite Rendezvous,” Journal of the Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 27, No. 9, Sept. 1960, pp. 653–658. https://doi.org/10.2514/8.8704 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Coey J. M. D., “Applications of Hard Magnets,” Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 1st ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, U.K., 2010, pp. 464–493 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845000 Google Scholar