Skip to main content
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Paper

Unsteady Flow Conditions During Dual-Bell Sneak Transition

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B35558

A cold-gas test campaign was conducted on a subscale dual-bell nozzle operating under sea-level conditions to study the unsteady flow conditions encountered during sneak transition, which is a phenomenon prevalent just before final transition occurs. The study reveals that the flow during sneak transition is highly unsteady and is the major source of side-load generation in the dual-bell nozzle preceding the final transition. Statistical analysis suggests that, as the separation front moves into the region of wall inflection, the separated shear layer gradually comes in close proximity to the nozzle extension wall that alters the flow development process in the recirculation/backflow region considerably. This sets the entire backflow region into pressure fluctuations, making the flow conditions highly unsteady. It is further observed that the flow during sneak transition is associated with low frequencies in the vicinity of the separation location (0.8 kHz), which decreases as the sneak transition nozzle pressure ratio is approached (0.2 kHz).

References

  • [1] Foster C. and Cowles F., “Experimental Study of Gas-Flow Separation in Overexpanded Exhaust Nozzles for Rocket Motors,” Jet Propulsion Lab., California Inst. of Technology, Progress Rept.  4-103, Pasadena, CA, 1949. Google Scholar

  • [2] Sutton N. N., “Liquid Rocket Engine Nozzles,” NASA Space Vehicle Design Criteria, NASA SP-8120, 1976.. Google Scholar

  • [3] Hagemann G., Immich H., Nguyen T. V. and Dumnov G. E., “Advanced Rocket Nozzles,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 14, No. 5, Sept–Oct. 1998, pp. 620–634. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5354 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Frey M. and Hagemann G., “Critical Assessment of Dual-Bell Nozzles,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 15, No. 1, Jan.–Feb. 1999, pp. 137–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5402 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Nasuti F., Onofri M and Martelli E., “Role of Wall Shape on the Transition in Axisymmetric Dual-Bell Nozzles,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 243–250. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.6524 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Chloe N.-G. and Ralf S., “Flow Transition in Dual Bell Nozzles,” Journal of Shock Waves, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2009, pp. 265–270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-008-0176-4 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Verma S. B., Stark R. and Haidn O., “Gas Density Effects on Dual-Bell Transition Behavior,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 28, No. 6, Nov.–Dec. 2012, pp. 1315–1323. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34451 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Horn M. and Fisher S., “Dual-Bell Altitude Compensating Nozzle,” NASA CR-194719, 1994. Google Scholar

  • [9] Martelli E., Scaramuzzino F. and Nasuti F., “Secondary Gas Injection Effect on Dual-Bell Nozzle Flow Transition,” 4th European Conference for Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS), Paper  996-1538-1-RV, Torus Press, St. Petersburg, Moscow, Russia, 2011. Google Scholar

  • [10] Miyazawa M. and Otsu H., “An Analytical Study on Design and Performance of Dual-Bell Nozzles,” 42nd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper  2004-380, Jan. 2004.. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Dumonov G., Ponomaryov N. B. and Voinov A. L., “Dual-Bell Nozzles for Rocket Engines of Launch Vehicle Upper Stages and Orbital Transfer Vehicles,” 33rd AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper  1997-3089, 1997. Google Scholar

  • [12] Kasuka K., Kumakawa A., Niino M., Konno A. and Atsumi M., “Experimental Study on Extendible and Dual-Bell Nozzles Under High Altitude Conditions,” AIAA Paper  2002-3303, 2002. Google Scholar

  • [13] Reijasse P., Coponet D., Luyssen J.-M., Bar V., Palerm S., Oswald J., Amouroux F., Robinet J.-C. and Kuszla P., “Wall Pressure and Thrust of a Dual Bell Nozzle in a Cold Gas Facility,” EUCASS Book Series: Progress in Flight Physics, Vol. 3, Torus Press, Moscow, 2009, pp. 655–674. Google Scholar

  • [14] Verma S. B., Stark R., Genin C. and Haidn O., “Flow Separation Characteristics of a Dual-Bell Nozzle During its Transition Modes,” Journal of Shock Waves, Vol. 20, No. 3, June 2010, pp. 191–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-010-0259-x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Chloé N.-G. and Ralf S., “Experimental Study on Flow Transition in Dual Bell Nozzles,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 26, No. 3, May–June 2010, pp. 497–502. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.47282 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Dzianis P., Yonezawa K., Hiroaki T., Kasumi A. and Yoshinobu T., “Jet Oscillation at Low-Altitude Operation Mode in Dual-Bell Nozzle,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 28, No. 5, Sept.–Oct. 2012, pp. 1071–1080. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34466 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Verma S. B., Stark R. and Haidn O., “Relation Between Shock Unsteadiness and the Origin of Side-Loads in a Thrust Optimized Parabolic Rocket Nozzle,” Aerospace Science and Technology Journal, Vol. 10, No. 6, Sept. 2006, pp. 474–483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2006.06.004 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Tomita T., Takahashi M. and Sasaki M., “Control of Transition Between Two Working Modes of a Dual-Bell Nozzle by Gas Injection,” AIAA Paper  2009-4952, 2009. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Chloé G. and Ralf S., “Experimental Investigation of the Inflection Geometry on Dual Bell Nozzle Flow Behavior,” AIAA Paper  2011-5612, 2011. Google Scholar

  • [20] Verma S. B. and Haidn O., “Study of Restricted Shock Separation Phenomena in a Thrust Optimized Parabolic Nozzle,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 25, No. 5, Sept.–Oct. 2009, pp. 1046–1057. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42351 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Barnhardt P. J. and Greber I., “Experimental Investigation of Unsteady Shock Wave Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions About a Blunt Fin,” NASA CR-202334, 1997. Google Scholar

  • [22] Dolling D. S. and Or C. T., “Unsteadiness in the Shock Wave Structure in Attached and Separated Compression Corner Flows,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 3, 1, 1985, pp. 24–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [23] Polivanov P. A., Sidorenko A. A. and Maslov A. A., “Experimental Study of Unsteady Effects in Shock Wave/Turbulent Boundary Layer Interaction,” 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper 2009-0409, Orlando, Florida, 2009.. Google Scholar

  • [24] Chloé G. and Stark R. H., “Side Loads in Subscale Dual Bell Nozzles,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2011, pp. 828–837. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34170 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Emanuele M., Francesco N. and Marcello O., “Numerical Parametric Analysis of Dual-Bell Nozzle Flows,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2007, pp. 640–650. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.26690 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Verma S. B., Stark R. and Haidn O., “Reynolds Number Influence on Dual-Bell Transition Phenomena,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 29, No. 3, May–June 2013, pp.602–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34734 LinkGoogle Scholar