Skip to main content
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Papers

Mission Analysis and Emissions for Conventional and Hybrid-Electric Commercial Transport Aircraft

Published Online:

A feasibility study of a hybrid-electric commercial transport aircraft was conducted by analyzing the simulated performance and lifecycle carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a conventional single-aisle aircraft and an aircraft with a modified parallel hybrid-electric propulsion system. A flight performance simulation was developed in a MATLAB/Simulink environment using publicly available aircraft data for the Boeing 737-700 commercial transport aircraft and the CFM56-7B26 turbofan engine. A parallel hybrid drivetrain was integrated into the aircraft performance model. Various missions with different degrees of hybridization and battery specific energy densities were simulated and compared to the conventional turbofan case. CO2 emissions associated with fuel burn and electricity generation for charging battery systems were modeled for each hybrid aircraft configuration. The results indicated that reductions in CO2 emissions per passenger mile were achievable using a parallel hybrid propulsion system as compared to conventional systems of equivalent range. A candidate propulsion system configuration was defined, which used a 50% electrical-power drivetrain and a battery specific energy density of 1000  (Wh)/kg. This configuration was estimated to produce 49.6% less lifecycle CO2 emissions than a modern conventional aircraft, with a maximum range equivalent to that of the average of all global flights, making it a viable option for environmentally responsible aviation.


  • [1] ICAO 2016 Environmental Report: Aviation and Climate Change,” International Civil Aviation Organization, Environmental Branch, Montreal, 2016. Google Scholar

  • [2] Aviation Emissions, Impacts & Mitigation: A Primer,” Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Environment and Energy, Jan. 2015. Google Scholar

  • [3] Nygren E., Aleklett K. and Höök M., “Aviation Fuel and Future Oil Production Scenarios,” Energy Policy, Vol. 37, No. 10, 2009, pp. 4003–4010. doi: ENPYAC 0301-4215 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] IATA Technology Roadmap, 4th ed., International Air Transport Association, Geneva, Switzerland, June 2013, pp. 1–19. Google Scholar

  • [5] Faria R., Moura P., Delgado J. and Almeida A. T., “A Sustainability Assessment of Electric Vehicles as a Personal Mobility System,” Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 61, Sept. 2012, pp. 19–30. doi: ECMADL 0196-8904 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Madavan N. K., Del Rosario R. and Jankovsky A. L., “Hybrid-Electric and Distributed Propulsion Technologies for Large Commercial Air Transports: A NASA Perspective,” NASA Ames Research Center ARC-E-DAA-TN27231, Moffett Field, CA, Sept. 2015, pp. 1–35. Google Scholar

  • [7] Hornung M., Isikveren A. T., Cole M. and Sizmann A., “Ce-Liner—A Case Study for eMobility in Air Transportation,” 2013 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA paper 2013-4302, Aug. 2013. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Stückl S., van Toor J. and Lobentanzer H., “Voltair—The All Electric Propulsion Concept Planform—A Vision for Atmospheric Friendly Flight,” 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, ICAS Paper 2012-4.7.2, Bonn, Germany, 2012, pp. 1–11. Google Scholar

  • [9] Bradley M. K. and Droney C. K., “Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research: Phase II—Volume II—Hybrid Electric Design Exploration,” Vol. 2, NASA CR-2015-218704, April 2015. Google Scholar

  • [10] Schiltgen B. T., Freeman J. L. and Hall D. W., “Aeropropulsive Interaction and Thermal System Integration Within the ECO-150: A Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Airliner with Conventional Electric Machines,” 16th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA Paper 2016-4064, June 2016. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Felder J. L., Kim H. D. and Brown G. V., “Turboelectric Distributed Propulsion Engine Cycle Analysis for Hybrid-Wing-Body Aircraft,” 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2009-1132, Jan. 2009. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Pornet C., Gologan C., Vratny P. C., Seitz A., Schmitz O., Isikveren A. T. and Hornung M., “Methodology for Sizing and Performance Assessment of Hybrid Energy Aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2015, pp. 341–352. doi: LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Schiltgen B., Gibson A. and Keith J., “Mission Performance Comparisons of Subsonic Airliners with Current and Future Propulsion Technologies,” AIAA Paper 2010-0279, 2010. LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Brown G. V., “Weights and Efficiencies of Electric Components of a Turboelectric Aircraft Propulsion System,” 49th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2011-0225, Jan. 2011. doi: LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Duffy K. P., “Electric Motor Considerations for Non-Cryogenic Hybrid Electric and Turboelectric Propulsion,” AIAA Propulsion and Energy Conference 2015, AIAA Paper 2015-3891, July 2015. Google Scholar

  • [16] Misra A., “Summary of 2017 NASA Workshop on Assessment of Advanced Battery Technologies for Aerospace Applications,” NASA Glenn Research Center Rept.  GRC-E-DAA-TN51429, Docuent ID: 20180001539, Cleveland, OH, Jan. 2018, pp. 1–18. Google Scholar

  • [17] Tetzloff I. J. and Crossley W. A., “Measuring Systemwide Impacts of New Aircraft on the Environment,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 51, No. 5, 2014, pp. 1483–1489. doi: LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Green M. W., Schiltgen B. T. and Gibson A. R., “Analysis of Distributed Hybrid Propulsion System with Conventional Electric Machines,” AIAA Paper 2012-3768, 2012. doi: LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Research Opportunities in Aeronautics–2016 (ROA-2016),” NASA Research Announcement, Solicitation NNH16ZEA001N, April 2016. Google Scholar

  • [20] McCormick B. W., Aerodynamics, Aeronautics, and Flight Mechanics, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York, 1995. Google Scholar

  • [21] Roskam J., “Airplane Design, Part VI: Preliminary Calculation of Aerodynamic, Thrust and Power Characteristics,” DAR Corp., Lawrence, KS, 2008. Google Scholar

  • [22] Hoak D. E. and Finck R. D. (Eds.), USAF Stability and Control DATCOM, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, 1978. Google Scholar

  • [23] Gur O., Mason W. and Shetz J., “Full Configuration Drag Estimation,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 47, No. 4, July–Aug. 2010. doi: LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Perkins H. D., Wilson J. and Raymer D. P., “An Evaluation of Performance Metrics for High Efficiency Tube-and-Wing Aircraft Entering Service in 2030 to 2035,” NASA TM-2011-217264, Nov. 2011. Google Scholar

  • [25] Melcher K. J., “The Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation (MAPSS) Users’ Guide,” NASA TM-2004-212968, March 2004. Google Scholar

  • [26] Hepperle M., “Electric Flight–Potential and Limitations,” NATO, STO-MP-AVT-209, Oct. 2012. Google Scholar

  • [27] Aeronautical Information Manual: Official Guide to Basic Flight Information and ATC Procedures,” Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, OK, Sept. 2018. Google Scholar

  • [28] Perkins H. D., Wilson J. and Raymer D. P., “An Evaluation of Performance Metrics for High Efficiency Tube-and-Wing Aircraft Entering Service in 2030 to 2035,” NASA/TM-2011-217264, Nov. 2011. Google Scholar

  • [29] General Operating and Flight Rules, 14 C.F.R. 91.117, 1993. Google Scholar

  • [30] Airport Reference Code and Approach Speeds for Boeing Airplanes,” The Boeing Company Airport Compatibility Engineering, Seal Beach, CA, March 2011. Google Scholar

  • [31] 737 Airplane Characteristics for Airport Planning,” The Boeing Company, Boeing Commercial Airplanes D6-58325-6, Seattle, WA, Oct. 2005. Google Scholar

  • [32] Harmon F. G., Frank A. A. and Chottot J., “Conceptual Design and Simulation of a Small Hybrid-Electric Unmanned Aerial Vehicle,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 43, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1490–1498. doi: LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [33] IEEE Recommended Practice for 1 kV to 35 kV Medium-Voltage DC Power System on Ship,” IEEE STD 1709–2010, Piscataway, NJ, 2010. Google Scholar

  • [34] Yilmaz I., “Evaluation of the Relationship Between Exhaust Gas Temperature and Operational Parameters in CFM56-7B Engines,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 223, No. 4, 2009, pp. 433–440. Google Scholar

  • [35] Commercial Aircraft Propulsion and Energy Systems Research: Reducing Global Carbon Emissions, National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2015. Google Scholar

  • [36] Rodda E., “EV Battery Comparison,” Meeting of the Australian Electric Vehicle Association, Australian Electric Vehicle Association–Adelaide Branch, Adelaide, Australia, 2010, pp. 1–26. Google Scholar

  • [37] Raymer D. P., Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 5th ed., AIAA Education Series, 2012. doi: LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [38] CTC Cable Corporation, “Energy Efficient High Current OH Conductors: Technical Data Sheet,” Midal Cable Conductor Data Sheet, July 2013. Google Scholar

  • [39] Sutkus D. J., Baughcum S. L. and DuBois D. P., “Scheduled Civil Aircraft Emission Inventories for 1999: Database Development and Analysis,” NASA CR-2001-211216, Oct. 2001. Google Scholar

  • [40] Filippone A., “Analysis of Carbon-Dioxide Emissions for Transport Aircraft,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2008, pp. 185–197. doi: LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [41] Kollmuss A. and Crimmins A. M., “Carbon Offsetting & Air Travel Part 2: Non-CO2 Emissions Calculations,” Stockholm Environment Inst. Discussion Paper, Somerville, MA, 2009. Google Scholar

  • [42] Energy Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions by State 2000–2015,” Energy Information Administration, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C., Jan. 2018. Google Scholar

  • [43] Wilkerson J. T., Jacobson M. Z., Malwitz A., Balasubramanian S., Wayson R., Fleming G., Naiman A. D. and Lele S. K., “Analysis of Emission Data from Global Commercial Aviation: 2004 and 2006,” Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol. 10, No. 13, 2010, pp. 6391–6408. doi: ACPTCE 1680-7324 CrossrefGoogle Scholar