Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search fdjslkfh
Advanced search
Cart
Join AIAA Institution Login
Skip main navigation
Journal of Aircraft logo
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Papers

Pilot-Centered Evaluation of Flight-Deck Interval Management Control Laws Using an A320 Simulator

Published Online:3 Aug 2020https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C035815

Abstract

Recent research on flight-deck interval management technology, including the findings of a flight-test demonstration conducted by NASA, led to the development of an alternative control logic for flight-deck interval management, termed as “interval management–speed planning.” As this logic demonstrated promising results in numerical simulations, for the first time, test pilots and airline pilots were invited to evaluate the system in an Airbus A320 simulator, using an avionics setup similar to the one employed in NASA’s flight test, on an approach for the Tokyo International Airport. A qualitative and quantitative survey was conducted in which the pilots’ opinions pertaining to their acceptance of the interval management operation and comprehension of the system behavior using both the original and alternative control logic, as well as a modified graphical user interface, were sought. The results indicated that the new control logic was well accepted by the pilots, confirming some of the results and hypotheses from the numerical simulation; nevertheless, it was indicated that further research on the user interface is needed to make full use of the logic’s capability.

References

  • [1] Baxley B. T., Swieringa K. A., Wilson S. R., Roper R. D., Abbot T. S., Hubbs C. E., Goess P. and Shay R. F., “Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration-1 (ATD-1) Avionics Phase 2 Flight Test and Results,” NASA TP–2018-219814, 2018. Google Scholar

  • [2] Baxley B. T., Swieringa K. A., Roper R. D., Hubbs C., Goess P. and Shay R., “Recommended Changes to Interval Management to Achieve Operational Implementation,” 2017 IEEE/AIAA 36th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2017, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC.2017.8102073 Google Scholar

  • [3] Baxley B. T., Swieringa K. A., Wilson S. R., Roper R. D., Hubbs C., Goess P. and Shay R., “Flight Crew Survey Responses from the Interval Management (IM) Avionics Phase 2 Flight Test,” 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA Paper 2017-4095, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-4095 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Swieringa K. A., Wilson S. R., Baxley B. T., Roper R. D., Abbott T. S., Levitt I. and Scharl J., “Flight Test Evaluation of the ATD-1 Interval Management Application,” 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, AIAA Paper 2017-4094, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-4094 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Baxley B. T., Johnson W. C., Scardina J. and Shay R. F., “Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration-1 Concept of Operations (ATD-1 ConOps), Version 3.0,” NASA TM-2016-219213, 2016. Google Scholar

  • [6] Banke J. and Gipson L., “NASA Presents FAA with New Air Traffic Management Technology [online journal],” NASA TV: Aeronautics, Oct. 2018, https://www.nasa.gov/aero/nasa-presents-faa-with-new-air-traffic-management-technology [retrieved 08 Oct. 2019]. Google Scholar

  • [7] Abbott T. S., “An Overview of a Trajectory-Based Solution for En Route and Terminal Area Self-Spacing: Seventh Revision,” NASA CR-2015-218794, 2015. Google Scholar

  • [8] Riedel T., Takahashi M. and Itoh E., “Reducing Speed Commands in Interval Management Using Speed Planning,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 124, No. 1272, pp. 189–215, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1017/aer.2019.12 Google Scholar

  • [9] Riedel T., Takahashi M., Itoh E., Frost P. and Feuerle T., “Evaluating Speed Logics for Flight-Deck Interval Management,” 6th ENRI International Workshop on ATM/CNS (EIWAC), Electronic Navigation Research Institute (ENRI), Paper EN-A-42, Tokyo, 2019. Google Scholar

  • [10] Riedel T., Takahashi M. and Itoh E., “Optimization of Interval Management—Speed Planning Using SMPSO,” Aeronautical Journal (accepted for publication). Google Scholar

  • [11] Wilber G. F., “ATM Technology Demonstration-1 Phase II Boeing Configurable Graphical Display (CGD) Software Design Description,” NASA CR-2017-219594, 2017. Google Scholar

  • [12] Itoh E., Fukushima S., Hirabayashi H., Wickramasinghe N. K. and Toratani D., “Evaluating Energy-Saving Arrivals of Wide-Body Passenger Aircraft via Flight-Simulator Experiments,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 55, No. 6, 2018, pp. 2427–2443. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034348 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Itoh E., Wickramasinghe N. K., Hirabayashi H. and Fukushima S., “Feasibility Study on Fixed Flight-Path Angle Descent for Wide-Body Passenger Aircraft,” CEAS Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2019, pp. 589–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0337-9 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Bone R. S. and Mendolia A. S., “Pilot and Air Traffic Controller use of Interval Management During Terminal Metering Operations,” MITRE TR MTR170570, McLean, VA, Jan 2018 Google Scholar

  • [15] “NextGen Implementation Plan 2018–2019,” Federal Aviation Administration, 2019, https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/media/NextGen_Implementation_Plan-2018-19.pdf [retrieved 24 June 2019]. Google Scholar

  • [16] “European ATM Master Plan: Edition 2015,” Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research (SESAR), https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/downloads/202 [retrieved 31 March 2019]. Google Scholar

  • [17] “Long-Term Vision for the Future Air Traffic Systems CARATS, Collaborative Actions for Renovations of Air Traffic Systems,” Study Group for the Future Air Traffic Systems, 2010, https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/000128185.pdf [retrieved 31 March 2019]. Google Scholar

  • [18] “Minimal Operational Performance Standards (MOPS) for Flight-Deck Interval Management (FIM),” RTCA DO-361, Washington, D.C., 2015. Google Scholar

  • [19] “Safety, Performance and Interoperability Requirements Document for Airborne Spacing—Flight Deck Interval Management (ASPA-FIM),” RTCA DO-328, Washington, D.C., 2011. Google Scholar

  • [20] Baxley B. T., Wilson S. R., Swieringa K. A., Johnson W. C., Roper R. D., Hubbs C., Goess P. A. and Shay R. F., “Human-in-the-Loop Assessment of Alternative Clearances in Interval Management Arrival Operations,” NASA TP–2016-219362, 2016. Google Scholar

  • [21] Toratani D., Wickramasinghe N. K. and Hirabayashi H., “Simulation Techniques for Arrival Procedure Design in Continuous Descent Operation,” Proceedings of the 2018 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC), IEEE, New York, 2018, pp. 2249–2260. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2018.8632350 Google Scholar

  • [22] “RJTT Charts Related to an Aerodrome,” Japan Civil Aviation Bureau Aeronautical Information Publication AD2-24, Tokyo, Japan, 19 July 2018. Google Scholar

  • [23] “User Manual for the Base of Aircraft Data (BADA) Revision 3.12,” Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, TR/Scientific Rept. 14/04/24-44, Brétigny-sur-Orge, France, 2014. Google Scholar

  • [24] Riedel T., Takahashi M., Tatsukawa T. and Itoh E., “Evaluating Applied Flight-Deck Interval Management Using Monte Carlo Simulations on the K-Supercomputer,” Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 62, No. 6, 2019, pp. 299–309. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Parks E., “Airbus Notes: Training Notes for A319/A320/A321,” March 2020, http://www.airbusdriver.net/airbusnotes.pdf [retrieved 12 Nov. 2019] Google Scholar

Previous article
Next article