Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search fdjslkfh
Advanced search
Cart
Join AIAA Institution Login
Skip main navigation
Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics logo
Skip to article control options
No AccessFull-Length Papers

Variable Stability In-Flight Simulation System Based on Existing Autopilot Hardware

Published Online:2 Sep 2020https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005066

Abstract

A variable stability in-flight simulator has the capabilities to change the response of an aircraft in-flight, often without changing the physical properties of the aircraft. The ability to adjust the aircraft response characteristics and handling qualities has various purposes, such as pilot training, control system development, and handling quality research. A variable stability control system is designed for a medium-range business jet using incremental nonlinear dynamic inversion. The performance of the in-flight simulator is verified by two experiments, one conducted in a fixed-base flight simulator and one in a Cessna Citation II laboratory aircraft. The fly-by-wire actuation system in the Cessna Citation II is based on its existing autopilot, inheriting the limited performance and safety protections. The simulator experiment shows differences between the experienced handling qualities for a reference model and the designed controller combined with aircraft dynamics. These differences mainly arise due to actuator saturation for specific handling quality settings. The in-flight experiment supports the simulator findings but also reveals how the available control authority around the initial condition is limited due to constraints of the fly-by-wire system.

References

  • [1] Weingarten N. C., “History of In-Flight Simulation at General Dynamics,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2005, pp. 290–298. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.4663 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Hamel P., In-Flight Simulators and Fly-by-Wire/Light Demonstrators, Springer International Publ. AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2017, Chaps. 2, 5. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Mirza A., Van Paassen M. M. and Mulder M., “Simulator Evaluation of a Medium-Cost Variable Stability System for a Business Jet,” Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2019-0370, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0370 Google Scholar

  • [4] Armstrong E. S., ORACLS, A Design System for Linear Multivariable Control, Control and Systems Theory, Vol. 10, M. Dekker, New York, 1980. Google Scholar

  • [5] O’Brien M. J. and Broussard J. R., “Feedforward Control to Track the Output of a Forced Model,” IEEE Conference on Decision and Control Including the 17th Symposium on Adaptive Processes, Inst. of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, 1979, pp. 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1980.1102409 Google Scholar

  • [6] Kreindler E. and Rothschild D., “Model-Following in Linear-Quadratic Optimization,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Journal, Vol. 14, No. 7, 1976, pp. 835–842. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.7160 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Slotine J. J. E. and Li W., Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991, Chap. 6. Google Scholar

  • [8] Ko J., Lee H. and Lee J., “In Flight Simulation for Flight Control Law Evaluation of Fly-by-Wire Aircraft,” Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2004. Google Scholar

  • [9] Ko J. and Lee H., “In Flight Simulation for Flight Control Law Evaluation of Fly-by-Wire Aircraft,” 2003 International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems ICCAS 2003, Gyeongju, Korea, 2003, pp. 2560–2565 . Google Scholar

  • [10] Miller C., “Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Baseline Control Law: Architecture and Performance Predictions,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-Located Conferences, AIAA Paper 2011-6467, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-6467 Google Scholar

  • [11] Smith P., “A Simplified Approach to Non-Linear Dynamic Inversion Based Flight Control,” 23rd Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, AIAA Paper 1998-4461, 1998. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-4461 Google Scholar

  • [12] Germann K. P., “T-6A Texan II In-Flight Simulation and Variable Stability System Design,” Ph.D. Thesis, Mississippi State Univ., Starkville, MS, 2006. Google Scholar

  • [13] Grondman F., Looye G., Kuchar R. O., Chu Q. P. and Van Kampen E., “Design and Flight Testing of Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion-Based Control Laws for a Passenger Aircraft,” 2018 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA SciTech Forum, AIAA Paper 2018-0385, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-0385 Google Scholar

  • [14] Zaal P., Pool D. M., in’t Veld A. C., Postema F. N., Mulder M., van Paassen M. M. and Mulder J. A., “Design and Certification of a Fly-by-Wire System with Minimal Impact on the Original Flight Controls,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2009-5985, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-5985 Google Scholar

  • [15] Nelson R. C., Flight Stability and Automatic Control, McGraw–Hill Education, New York, 1998, Chap. 10. Google Scholar

  • [16] Bryson A. E. and Ho Y. C., Applied Optimal Control, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C., 1975, Chap. 14. Google Scholar

  • [17] Ko J. and Park S., “Design of a Variable Stability Flight Control System,” KSAS International Journal, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2008, pp. 162–168. Google Scholar

  • [18] Bacon B. and Ostroff A., “Reconfigurable Flight Control Using Non-Linear Dynamic Inversion with a Special Accelerometer Implementation,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2000-4565, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-4565 Google Scholar

  • [19] Cox T. and Cotting M., “A Generic Inner-Loop Control Law Structure for Six-Degree-of-Freedom Conceptual Aircraft Design,” 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Aerospace Sciences Meetings, AIAA Paper 2005-31, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-31 Google Scholar

  • [20] Smeur E. J. J., Chu Q. P. and de Croon G. C. H.E., “Adaptive Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion for Attitude Control of Micro Air Vehicles,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 3, 2016, pp. 450–461. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001490 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Smeur E. J. J., de Croon G. C. H. E. and Chu Q. P., “Cascaded Incremental Nonlinear Dynamic Inversion Control for MAV Disturbance Rejection,” Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 73, April 2018, pp. 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2018.01.003 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Keijzer T., Looye G., Chu Q. P. and Van Kampen E.-J., “Design and Flight Testing of Incremental Backstepping Based Control Laws with Angular Accelerometer Feedback,” AIAA SciTech 2019 Forum, AIAA Paper 2019-0129, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0129 Google Scholar

  • [23] Cooper G. E. and Harper R. P., “Handling Qualities and Pilot Evaluation,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 9, No. 5, 1986, pp. 515–529. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20142 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Bihrle W., “A Handling Qualities Theory for Precise Flight Path Control,” Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab. TR AFFDL-TR-65-198, New York, 1966. Google Scholar

  • [25] Requirements for Flying Qualities of Piloted Aircraft, Dept. of Defense, Standard, MIL-STD-1797A, 1990. Google Scholar

  • [26] Bischoff D. E., “The Control Anticipation Parameter for Augmented Aircraft,” Naval Air Development Center TR NADC-81186-60, Warminster, 1981. Google Scholar

  • [27] Di Franco D. A., “In-Flight Investigation of the Effects of Higher-Order Control System Dynamics on Longitudinal Handling Qualities,” Cornel Aeronautic Lab. AFFL-TR-68-90, Buffalo, NY, 1968. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.3800080206 Google Scholar

  • [28] Hodgkinson J., LaManna W. J. and Heyde J. L., “Handling Qualities of Aircraft with Stability and Control Augmentation Systems-A Fundamental Approach,” The Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 80, No. 782, 1976, pp. 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000033510 Google Scholar

  • [29] Morelli E. A., Identification of Low Order System Models From Flight Equivalent Test Data, NASA Langley Research Center, Langley, VA, 2000. Google Scholar

  • [30] Johnson E. N. and Calise A. J., “Pseudo-Control Hedging: A New Method for Adaptive Control,” Advances in Navigation Guidance and Control Technology Workshop, Redstone Arsenal, AL, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1.1.16.4719 Google Scholar

  • [31] Lombaerts T. and Looye G., “Design and Flight Testing of Manual Nonlinear Flight Control Laws,” AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2011-6469, 2011. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-6469 Google Scholar

  • [32] Borst C., CITAST: Citation Analysis and Simulation Toolkit, Delft Univ. of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands, 2004. Google Scholar

  • [33] Van den Hoek M. A., de Visser C. C. and Pool D. M., “Identification of a Cessna Citation II Model Based on Flight Test Data,” Advances in Aerospace Guidance, Navigation and Control, Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2018, pp. 259–277. Google Scholar

  • [34] van Paassen M. M., Stroosma O. and Delatour J., “DUECA—Data-Driven Activation in Distributed Real-Time Computation,” Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference, Guidance, Navigation, and Control and Co-Located Conferences, AIAA Paper 2000-4503, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2000-4503 Google Scholar

  • [35] Edwards C. and Spurgeon S. K., “On the Development of Discontinuous Observers,” International Journal of Control, Vol. 59, No. 5, 1994, pp. 1211–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179408923128 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Previous article
Next article