Ontological Foundations of European Coordination Centre for Accident and Incident Reporting Systems

References

• [1] ECCAIRS Community Portal [online database], http://eccairsportal.jrc.ec.europa.eu [retrieved 5 Nov. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [2] EuropeanAviationSafetyAgency, Aviation Safety Reporting, http://www.aviationreporting.eu/index.php?id=196 [retrieved 5 Nov. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [3] Stolzer A. J. and Goglia J. J., Safety Management Systems in Aviation, Taylor and Francis, Philadelphia, PA, 2016, p. 189. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [4] Stojić S., Vittek P., Plos V. and Lališ A., “Taxonomies and Their Role in the Aviation Safety Management Systems,” eXclusive e-JOURNAL, No. 1, 2015, http://exclusiveejournal.sk/issue-1-2015.html [retrieved 29 March 2017]. Google Scholar

• [5] E-TOKAI Web Page, http://www.e-tokai.net [retrieved 5 Nov. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [6] HEIDI Taxonomy, 2004, http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/esarr-2-reporting-and-assessment-safety-occurrences-atm [retrieved 10 July 2016]. Google Scholar

• [7] The Commercial Aviation Safety Team/ICAO Common Taxonomy Team (CICTT), http://www.intlaviationstandards.org/ [retrieved 30 Nov. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [8] ATM Lexicon, http://www.eurocontrol.int/lexicon/lexicon/en/index.php/Main_Page [retrieved 3 Aug. 2015]. Google Scholar

• [9] ICAO Glossary, http://www.intlaviationstandards.org/apex/f?p=240:1:15338757287208::NO::P1_X:Glossary [retrieved 3 Aug. 2015]. Google Scholar

• [10] Shappell S. A. and Wiegmann D. A., “The Human Factors Analysis and Classification System–HFACS, ” U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Final Rept. DOT/FAA/AM-00/7, Feb. 2000. Google Scholar

• [11] ATA Specification 100-Specification for Manufacturers’ Technical Data, Revision No. 37, Air Transport Association of America, 1999. Google Scholar

• [12] “Federal Aviation Administration Joint Aircraft System/Component Code: Table and Definitions, Federal Aviation Administration,” 27 Oct. 2008, http://av-info.faa.gov/sdrx/documents/JASC_Code.pdf [retrieved 27 Aug. 2015]. Google Scholar

• [13] Ast M., Glas M. and Roehm T., “Creating an Ontology for Aircraft Design,” Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress, 2013, http://publikationen.dglr.de/?tx_dglrpublications_pi1%5Bdocument_id%5D=301356 [retrieved 29 March 2017]. Google Scholar

• [14] Valente A., Russ T., MacGregor R. and Swartout W., “Building and (Re)Using an Ontology of Air Campaign Planning,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 14, No. 1, Jan. 1999, pp. 27–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/5254.747903 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [15] Reiss M., Moal M., Barnard Y., Ramu J.-Ph. and Froger A., “Using Ontologies to Conceptualize the Aeronautical Domain,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, 2006. Google Scholar

• [16] Su K.-W., Wang H.-Y., Li K.-J., Wang C.-H. and Hsiao P.-H., “Designing and Evaluating an Ontology-Based Air Traffic Control Digital Knowledge Learning System,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aeronautics, Cépaduès-Editions, Toulouse, France, 2011, pp. 56–63. Google Scholar

• [17] Abou Assali A., Lenne D. and Debray B., “KoMIS: An Ontology-Based Knowledge Management System for Industrial Safety,” Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, DEXA ‘07, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 475–479. Google Scholar

• [18] Guebitz B., Schnedl H. and Khinast J. G., “A Risk Management Ontology for Quality-by-Design Based on a New Development Approach According GAMP 5.0,” Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, No. 8, June 2012, pp. 7291–7301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.089 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [19] Debray B., Abou Assali A., Pradaud I., Vaudelin J. and Lenne D., “Knowledge Management for Industrial Safety, Generic Resource Platform Combined with an Ontology Based Approach,” International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotionin the Process Industry, Edimbourg, United Kingdom, May 2007, p. 8, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278806601_Knowledge_management_for_industrial_safety_generic_resource_platform_combined_with_an_ontology_based_approach [accessed 29 March 2017]. Google Scholar

• [20] Lykourentzou I., Papadaki K., Kalliakmanis A., Djaghloul Y., Latour T., Charalabis I. and Kapetanios E., “Ontology-Based Operational Risk Management,” 13th IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing, CEC 2011, edited by Hofreiter B., Dubois E., Lin K.-J., Setzer T., Godart C., Proper E. and Bodenstaff L., IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., Sept. 2011, pp. 153–160. Google Scholar

• [21] Falbo R. d. A., Ruy F. B., Bertollo G. and Togneri D. F., “Learning How to Manage Risks Using Organizational Knowledge,” Proceedings of Advances in Learning Software Organizations, 6th International Workshop, LSO 2004, edited by Holz H. and Melnik G., Vol. 3096, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, New York, 2004, pp. 7–18. Google Scholar

• [22] Access to Air Safety Information, Oct. 2002, https://aviation-safety.net/pubs/asn/Access-ASI-paper.pdf [retrieved 29 March 2017]. Google Scholar

• [23] “Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the Reporting, Analysis and Follow-Up of Occurrences in Civil Aviation, Amending Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Repealing Directive 2003/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1321/2007 and (EC) No 1330/2007 Text with EEA Relevance,” Council of the European Union “Regulation 376/2014,” 3 April 2014, %http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32014R0376 [retrieved 07 Feb. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [24] “Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1018 of 29 June 2015 Laying Down a List Classifying Occurrences in Civil Aviation to be Mandatorily Reported According to Regulation (EU) No 376/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Text with EEA Relevance),” Council of the European Union Regulation 2015/1018, 2015, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2015.163.01.0001.01.ENG [retrieved 7 Feb. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [25] ICAO ADREP [online database], SKYbrary, http://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/ICAO_ADREP [retrieved 5 Nov. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [26] ECCAIRS Implementation [online database], International Civil Aviation Organization, Bangkok, http://www2010.icao.int/SAM/SSP/Pages/ECCAIRS_Implementation.aspx [retrieved 5 Nov. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [27] ICAO ADREP, http://www.icao.int/safety/airnavigation/AIG/Documents [retrieved 3 Aug. 2015]. Google Scholar

• [28] Guizzardi G., “Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models,” Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, Oct. 2005. Google Scholar

• [29] Gruber T. R., “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification,” Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1993, pp. 199–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008 KNACE9 1042-8143 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [30] Studer R., Benjamins R. R. and Fensel D., “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods,” Data Knowledge Engineering, Vol. 25, Nos. 1–2, 1998, pp. 161–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [31] Gomez-Perez A., Fernandez-Lopez M. and Corcho O., Ontological Engineering, Springer, New York, 2005, p. 125. Google Scholar

• [32] Auer S. and Herre H., “Rapid OWL—An Agile Knowledge Engineering Methodology,” Perspectives of System Informatics (PSI’06), edited by Virbitskaite I. and Voronkov A., Vol. 4378, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Berlin, June 2006. Google Scholar

• [33] Suárez-Figueroa M. d. C., Gómez-Pérez A., Motta E. and Gangemi A., (eds.), Ontology Engineering in a Networked World, Springer, New York, 2012, p. 9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [34] Gangemi A., Guarino N., Masolo C., Oltramari A. and Schneider L., “Sweetening Ontologies with DOLCE,” Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. Ontologies and the Semantic Web, EKAW ‘02, Springer–Verlag, London, 2002, pp. 166–181. Google Scholar

• [35] Grenon P. and Smith B., “SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology,” Spatial Cognition and Computation, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2004, pp. 69–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427633scc0401_5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [36] Niles I. and Pease A., “Toward a Standard Upper Ontology,” Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS-2001), edited by Welty C. and Smith B., ACM, New York, 2001, pp. 2–9. Google Scholar

• [37] Guizzardi G., Wagner G., Falbo R. d. A., Guizzardi R. S. S. and Almeida J. P. A., Towards Ontological Foundations for the Conceptual Modeling of Events, Vol. 8217, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, edited by Ng W., Storey V. C. and Trujillo J., Springer, New York, 2013, pp. 327–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [38] Green P. and Rosemann M., Business Systems Analysis with Ontologies, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA, June 2005, p. 345. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [39] Nardi J. C., Falbo R. d. A., Almeida J. P. A., Guizzardi G., Pires L. F., van Sinderen M. and Guarino N., “Towards a Commitment-Based Reference Ontology for Services,” edited by Gasevic D., Hatala M., Motahari Nezhad H. R. and Reichert M., IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 175–184. Google Scholar

• [40] Allen J. F., “Maintaining Knowledge About Temporal Intervals,” Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 11, Nov. 1983, pp. 832–843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/182.358434 CACMA2 0001-0782 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [41] Lano K., UML 2 Semantics and Applications, Wiley, New York, 2009. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [42] Guizzardi G., Paulo J., Almeida P. J., Guarino N. and Carvalho V. A., “Towards an Ontological Analysis of Powertypes,” Proceedings of the Joint Ontology Workshops 2015 Episode 1: The Argentine Winter of Ontology Co-Located with the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 2015, http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1517/JOWO-15_FOfAI_paper_7.pdf. Google Scholar

• [43] Motik B., Patel-Schneider P. F. and Parsia B., “OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax,” W3C Recommendation, Dec. 2012, https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/ [retrieved 29 March 2017]. Google Scholar

• [44] Baader F., Calvanese D., McGuinness D. L., Nardi D. and Patel-Schneider P. F., The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications, 2nd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2010. Google Scholar

• [45] Horrocks I., Patel-Schneider P. F., Boley H., Tabet S., Grosof B. and Dean M., “SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML,” W3C Member Submission, World Wide Web Consortium, 2004, https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL [retrieved 29 March 2017]. Google Scholar

• [46] Kremen P. and Kostov B., “Expressive OWL Queries: Design, Evaluation, Visualization,” International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, Vol. 8, No. 4, Oct. 2012, pp. 57–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSWIS CrossrefGoogle Scholar

• [47] Barcelos P. P. F., dos Santos V. A., Silva F. B., Monteiro M. E. and Garcia A. S., “An Automated Transformation from OntoUML to OWL and SWRL,” ONTOBRAS, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1041, edited by Bax M. P., Almeida M. B. and Wassermann R., CEUR-WS, 2013, pp. 130–141, CEUR-WS.org [retrieved 29 March 2017]. Google Scholar

• [48] Czech Air Accidents Investigation Institute [online database], http://www.uzpln.cz/en/ln_incident [retrieved 1 Feb. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [49] INBAS Project [online database], Technology Agency of the Czech Republic, Prague, http://www.inbas.cz [retrieved 1 Dec. 2016]. Google Scholar

• [50] Chemical Entities of Biological Interest OntoQuery [online database], https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chebi/tools/ontoquery [retrieved 27 Aug. 2015]. Google Scholar

• [51] “European Aviation Safety Plan 2013–2016,” European Aviation Safety Agency Final Report, Cologne, Germany, https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/files/dfu/sms-docs-European-Aviation-Safety-Plan-(2013-2016)--v1.0-Final.pdf [retrieved 10 July 2016]. Google Scholar

• [52] “History of Quadcopters and Other Multirotors,” Krossblade Aerospace Systems, Phoenix, AZ, http://www.krossblade.com/history-of-quadcopters-and-multirotors [retrieved 10 July 2016]. Google Scholar

• [53] Pan F. and Hobbs J., (eds.) “Time Ontology in OWL: W3C Working Draft,” W3C, Cambridge, MA, 27 Sept. 2006, http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-owl-time-20060927. Google Scholar

• [54] Clementini E., Di Felice P. and van Oosterom P., “A Small Set of Formal Topological Relationships Suitable for End-User Interaction,” Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Advances in Spatial Databases, SSD ‘93, Springer–Verlag, London, 1993, pp. 277–295. Google Scholar

• [55] Brickley D., “W3C Semantic Web Interest Group: Basic Geo (WGS845 Lat/Long) Vocabulary,” edited by D. Brickley, 2006, W3C, Cambridge, MA, http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/ [retrieved 10 July 2016]. Google Scholar

• [56] Horrocks I. and Sattler U., “Decidability of $\mathcal{S}\mathcal{H}\mathcal{I}\mathcal{Q}$ with Complex Role Inclusion Axioms,” 2003. Google Scholar

• [57] Horridge M., OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Manchester Syntax, 2nd ed., W3C, Cambridge, MA, 2012, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-manchester-syntax [retrieved 26 Aug. 2015]. Google Scholar