Bioinspired Trailing-Edge Noise Control
Abstract
Strategies for trailing-edge noise control have been inspired by the downy canopy that covers the surface of exposed flight feathers of many owl species. Previous wind-tunnel measurements demonstrate that canopies of similar characteristics can reduce pressure fluctuations on the underlying surface by as much as 30 dB and significantly attenuate roughness noise generated by that surface. In the present work, surface treatments are designed to replicate the effects of the canopy in a form suitable for application to an airfoil. These treatments are installed directly upstream of the trailing edge to modify the boundary-layer turbulence before acoustic scattering by the edge. Over 20 variants of these designs have been tested by performing aeroacoustic wind-tunnel measurements on a tripped DU96-W180 airfoil at chord Reynolds numbers of up to 3 million. Compared with the unmodified airfoil, the treatments provided up to 10 dB of broadband attenuation of trailing-edge noise. The effectiveness of the treatment is not highly dependent on a particular geometry, but there appears to be strong potential for optimization. The surface treatments remain effective over an angle-of-attack range that extends over 9 deg from zero lift. Aerodynamic impact of the treatment appears minimal.
References
[1] , “The Silent Flight of Owls,” Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Vol. 38, No. 286, 1934, pp. 837–843. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0368393100109915
[2] , “Low Speed Aerodynamics for Ultra-Quiet Flight,” U.S. Air Force Flight Dynamics Lab. Technical Rept. AFFDL-TR-71-75, Wright–Patterson AFB, OH, 1972.
[3] , “Silent Owl Flight: Bird Flyover Noise Measurements,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2011, pp. 769–779. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050703 AIAJAH 0001-1452
[4] , “Measurement of the Noise Generation at the Trailing Edge of Porous Airfoils,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2010, pp. 291–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-009-0739-x EXFLDU 0723-4864
[5] , “Aerodynamic Noise from a Poroelastic Edge with Implications for the Silent Flight of Owls,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 723, May 2013, pp. 456–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2013.139 JFLSA7 0022-1120
[6] , “Parametric Guidance for Turbulent Noise Reduction from Poroelastic Trailing Edges and Owls,” Proceedings of the 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper 2013-2007, May 2013.
[7] , “The Noise Generating and Suppressing Characteristics of Bio-Inspired Rough Surfaces,” Proceedings of the AIAA/CEAS 20th Aeroacoustics Conference, AIAA Paper 2014-2911, June 2014.
[8] , “The Far-Field Sound from Rough-Wall Boundary Layers,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 465, No. 2106, 2009, pp. 1717–1734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2008.0318
[9] , “Some Mean Velocity, Turbulence and Unsteadiness Characteristics of the VPI & SU Stability Wind Tunnel,” Department of Aerospace and Ocean Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univ. Rept. VPI-Aero-161, Blacksburg, VA, 1987.
[10] , “The Kevlar-Walled Anechoic Wind Tunnel,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 332, No. 17, 2013, pp. 3971–3991. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.02.043 JSVIAG 0022-460X
[11] , “Riblets as a Viscous Drag Reduction Technique,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, 1983, pp. 485–486. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/3.60126 AIAJAH 0001-1452
[12] , “Direct Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Flow over Riblets,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 255, Oct. 1993, pp. 503–539. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112093002575 JFLSA7 0022-1120
[13] , “CLEAN Based on Spatial Source Coherence,” Aeroacoustics, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2007, pp. 357–374. doi:https://doi.org/10.1260/147547207783359459
[14] , “XFOIL: An Analysis and Design System for Low Reynolds Number Airfoils,” Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, Vol. 54,
Lecture Notes in Engineering , Springer–Verlag, Berlin, 1989, pp. 1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-84010-4_1