Skip to main content
No AccessRegular Article

Unseeded Velocity Measurements Around a Transonic Airfoil Using Femtosecond Laser Tagging

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056154

Femtosecond laser electronic excitation tagging velocimetry was used to study the flowfield around a symmetric, transonic airfoil in the NASA Langley Research Center’s 0.3 m transonic cryogenic tunnel facility. A nominal Mach number of 0.85 was investigated with a total pressure of 125 kPa and a total temperature of 280 K. Two components of velocity were measured along vertical profiles at different locations above, below, and aft of the airfoil at angles of attack of 0 and 7 deg. Velocity profiles within the wake showed sufficient accuracy, precision, and sensitivity to resolve both the mean and fluctuating velocities and general flow physics, such as shear-layer growth. Evidence of flow separation was found at high angles of attack. Velocity measurements were assessed for their accuracy, precision, dynamic range, spatial resolution, and overall measurement uncertainty as they relate to the present experiments. Measurement precisions as low as 1  m/s were observed, whereas the velocity dynamic range was found to be nearly a factor of 500. The spatial resolution of between 1 and 5 mm was found to be primarily limited by the femtosecond laser electronic excitation tagging spot size and advection of the flow. Overall measurement uncertainties ranged from 3 to 4%.

References

  • [1] Ladson C. L. and Ray E. J., “Evolution, Calibration, and Operational Characteristics of the Two-Dimensional Test Section of the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TP-2749, 1987. Google Scholar

  • [2] Snow W. L., Burner A. W. and Goad W. K., “Image Degradation in Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TM 84550, 1982. Google Scholar

  • [3] Snow W. L., Burner A. W. and Goad W. K., “Improvement in the Quality of Flow Visualization in the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TM-87730, 1987. Google Scholar

  • [4] Batill S. M., “Experimental Uncertainty and Drag Measurements in the National Transonic Facility,” NASA CR 4600, 1994. Google Scholar

  • [5] Fey U., Konrath R., Kirmse T., Ahlefeldt T., Kompenhans J. and Egami Y., “Advanced Measurement Techniques for High Reynolds Number Testing in Cryogenic Wind Tunnels,” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper  2010-1301, 2010, pp. 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-1301 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Watkins A. N., Leighty B. D., Lipford W. E., Oglesby D. M., Goodman K. Z., Goad W. K., Goad L. R. and Massey E. A., “The Development and Implementation of a Cryogenic Pressure Sensitive Paint System in the National Transonic Facility,” 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, ” AIAA Paper  2009-0421, 2009, pp. 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-421 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Fey U., Engler R. H., Egami Y., Iijima Y., Asai K., Jansen U. and Quest J., “Transition Detection by Temperature Sensitive Paint at Cryogenic Temperatures in the European Transonic Windtunnel (ETW),” 20th International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities (ICIASF), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2003, pp. 77–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIASF.2003.1274855 Google Scholar

  • [8] Asai K., Amao Y., Iijima Y., Okura I. and Nishide H., “Novel Pressure-Sensitive Paint for Cryogenic and Unsteady Wind-Tunnel Testing,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, pp. 109–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6658 JTHTEO 0887-8722 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Yorita D., Klein C., Henne U., Ondrus V., Beifuss U., Hensch A. K., Guntermann P. and Quest J., “Application of Lifetime-Based Pressure-Sensitive Paint Technique to Cryogenic Wind Tunnel Tests,” 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper  2016-0649, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0649 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Quest J. and Konrath R., “Accepting a Challenge—The Development of PIV for Application in Pressurized Cryogenic Wind Tunnels,” 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper  2011-3726, 2011. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3726 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Willert C., Stockhausen G., Beversdorff M., Klinner J., Lempereur C., Barricau P., Quest J. and Jansen U., “Application of Doppler Global Velocimetry in Cryogenic Wind Tunnels,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2005, pp. 420–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0914-z EXFLDU 0723-4864 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [12] Gartrell L. R., Gooderum P. B., Hunter W. W. and Meyers J. F., “Laser Velocimetry Technique Applied to the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TM-81913, 1981. Google Scholar

  • [13] Honaker W. C. and Lawing P. L., “Measurements in the Flow Field of a Cylinder with a Laser Transit Anemometer and a Drag Rake in the Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TM-86399, 1985. Google Scholar

  • [14] Michael J. B., Edwards M. R., Dogariu A. and Miles R. B., “Femtosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging for Quantitative Velocity Imaging in Air,” Applied Optics, Vol. 50, No. 26, 2011, pp. 5158–5162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005158 APOPAI 0003-6935 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Limbach C. M. and Miles R. B., “Rayleigh Scattering Measurements of Heating and Gas Perturbations Accompanying Femtosecond Laser Tagging,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2017, pp. 112–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054772 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Zhang Y., Shneider M. N. and Miles R. B., “Characterization of Intermediate Reactions Following Femtosecond Laser Excitation in Argon-Nitrogen Mixtures,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper  2017-0841, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0841 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Edwards M. R., Dogariu A. and Miles R. B., “Simultaneous Temperature and Velocity Measurements in Air with Femtosecond Laser Tagging,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, No. 8, 2015, pp. 2280–2288. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053685 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [18] Miles R. B., Edwards M. R., Michael J. B., Calvert N. D. and Dogariu A., “Femtosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging (FLEET) for Imaging Flow Structure in Unseeded Hot or Cold Air or Nitrogen,” 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper  2013-0340, 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-340 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Danehy P. M., Bathel B. F., Calvert N. D., Dogariu A. and Miles R. B., “Three Component Velocity and Acceleration Measurement Using FLEET,” 30th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, AIAA Paper  2014-2228, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-2228 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [20] Jiang N., Slipchenko M. N., Mance J. G., Felver J., Stauffer H., Yi T., Danehy P. M. and Roy S., “Seedless Velocimetry at 100-kHz with Picosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging (PLEET),” Optics Letters, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2017, pp. 239–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.000239 OPLEDP 0146-9592 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Jiang N., Halls B. R., Stauffer H. U., Danehy P. M., Gord J. R. and Roy S., “Selective Two-Photon Absorptive Resonance Femtosecond-Laser Electronic-Excitation Tagging Velocimetry,” Optics Letters, Vol. 41, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2225–2228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.002225 OPLEDP 0146-9592 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Limbach C. M. and Miles R. B., “Characterization of Dissociation and Gas Heating in Femtosecond Laser Plasma with Planar Rayleigh Scattering and Rayleigh Scattering Polarimetry,” 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper  2015-0932, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0932 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [23] New-Tolley M. R., Shneider M. N. and Miles R. B., “Modeling of the FLEET Filament Interaction with a Nonuniform Gas Flow,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper  2017-0257, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0257 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Burns R. A., Danehy P. M., Halls B. R. and Jiang N., “Application of FLEET Velocimetry in the NASA Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” 31st AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, AIAA Paper  2015-2566, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-2566 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [25] Burns R. A., Peters C. J. and Danehy P. M., “Femtosecond-Laser-Based Measurements of Velocity and Density in the NASA Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” 32nd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, AIAA Paper  2016-3246, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3246 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [26] Burns R. A., Danehy P. M., Halls B. R. and Jiang N., “Femtosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging Velocimetry in a Transonic, Cryogenic Wind Tunnel,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2017, pp. 680–685. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055325 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Raffel M., Willert C., Werely S. and Kompenhans J., Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide, Springer, New York, 2007, Chap. 9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [28] Bathel B. F., Danehy P. M., Inman J. A., Jones S. B., Ivey C. B. and Goyne C. P., “Velocity Profile Measurements in Hypersonic Flows Using Sequentially Imaged Fluorescence-Based Molecular Tagging,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 49, No. 9, 2011, pp. 1883–1896. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050722 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Hart R. C., Balla R. J. and Herring G. C., “Simultaneous Velocimetry and Thermometry of Air by Use of Nonresonant Heterodyned Laser-Induced Thermal Acoustics,” Applied Optics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2001, pp. 965–968. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.000965 APOPAI 0003-6935 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [30] Balla R. J., “Iodine Tagging Velocimetry in a Mach 10 Wake,” AIAA Journal., Vol. 51, No. 7, 2013, pp. 1783–1786. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052416 AIAJAH 0001-1452 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Parziale N. J., Smith M. S. and Marineau E. C., “Krypton Tagging Velocimetry of an Underexpanded Jet,” Applied Optics, Vol. 54, No. 16, 2015, pp. 5094–5101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.005094 APOPAI 0003-6935 CrossrefGoogle Scholar