Unseeded Velocity Measurements Around a Transonic Airfoil Using Femtosecond Laser Tagging
Abstract
Femtosecond laser electronic excitation tagging velocimetry was used to study the flowfield around a symmetric, transonic airfoil in the NASA Langley Research Center’s 0.3 m transonic cryogenic tunnel facility. A nominal Mach number of 0.85 was investigated with a total pressure of 125 kPa and a total temperature of 280 K. Two components of velocity were measured along vertical profiles at different locations above, below, and aft of the airfoil at angles of attack of 0 and 7 deg. Velocity profiles within the wake showed sufficient accuracy, precision, and sensitivity to resolve both the mean and fluctuating velocities and general flow physics, such as shear-layer growth. Evidence of flow separation was found at high angles of attack. Velocity measurements were assessed for their accuracy, precision, dynamic range, spatial resolution, and overall measurement uncertainty as they relate to the present experiments. Measurement precisions as low as were observed, whereas the velocity dynamic range was found to be nearly a factor of 500. The spatial resolution of between 1 and 5 mm was found to be primarily limited by the femtosecond laser electronic excitation tagging spot size and advection of the flow. Overall measurement uncertainties ranged from 3 to 4%.
References
[1] , “Evolution, Calibration, and Operational Characteristics of the Two-Dimensional Test Section of the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TP-2749, 1987.
[2] , “Image Degradation in Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TM 84550, 1982.
[3] , “Improvement in the Quality of Flow Visualization in the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TM-87730, 1987.
[4] , “Experimental Uncertainty and Drag Measurements in the National Transonic Facility,” NASA CR 4600, 1994.
[5] , “Advanced Measurement Techniques for High Reynolds Number Testing in Cryogenic Wind Tunnels,” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper 2010-1301, 2010, pp. 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-1301
[6] , “The Development and Implementation of a Cryogenic Pressure Sensitive Paint System in the National Transonic Facility,” 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, ” AIAA Paper 2009-0421, 2009, pp. 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-421
[7] , “Transition Detection by Temperature Sensitive Paint at Cryogenic Temperatures in the European Transonic Windtunnel (ETW),” 20th International Congress on Instrumentation in Aerospace Simulation Facilities (ICIASF), IEEE Publ., Piscataway, NJ, 2003, pp. 77–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIASF.2003.1274855
[8] , “Novel Pressure-Sensitive Paint for Cryogenic and Unsteady Wind-Tunnel Testing,” Journal of Thermophysics and Heat Transfer, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2002, pp. 109–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6658 JTHTEO 0887-8722
[9] , “Application of Lifetime-Based Pressure-Sensitive Paint Technique to Cryogenic Wind Tunnel Tests,” 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2016-0649, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0649
[10] , “Accepting a Challenge—The Development of PIV for Application in Pressurized Cryogenic Wind Tunnels,” 41st AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2011-3726, 2011. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2011-3726
[11] , “Application of Doppler Global Velocimetry in Cryogenic Wind Tunnels,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2005, pp. 420–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-004-0914-z EXFLDU 0723-4864
[12] , “Laser Velocimetry Technique Applied to the Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TM-81913, 1981.
[13] , “Measurements in the Flow Field of a Cylinder with a Laser Transit Anemometer and a Drag Rake in the Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” NASA TM-86399, 1985.
[14] , “Femtosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging for Quantitative Velocity Imaging in Air,” Applied Optics, Vol. 50, No. 26, 2011, pp. 5158–5162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.50.005158 APOPAI 0003-6935
[15] , “Rayleigh Scattering Measurements of Heating and Gas Perturbations Accompanying Femtosecond Laser Tagging,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2017, pp. 112–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J054772 AIAJAH 0001-1452
[16] , “Characterization of Intermediate Reactions Following Femtosecond Laser Excitation in Argon-Nitrogen Mixtures,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2017-0841, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0841
[17] , “Simultaneous Temperature and Velocity Measurements in Air with Femtosecond Laser Tagging,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, No. 8, 2015, pp. 2280–2288. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053685 AIAJAH 0001-1452
[18] , “Femtosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging (FLEET) for Imaging Flow Structure in Unseeded Hot or Cold Air or Nitrogen,” 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper 2013-0340, 2013. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-340
[19] , “Three Component Velocity and Acceleration Measurement Using FLEET,” 30th AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, AIAA Paper 2014-2228, 2014. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-2228
[20] , “Seedless Velocimetry at 100-kHz with Picosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging (PLEET),” Optics Letters, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2017, pp. 239–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.000239 OPLEDP 0146-9592
[21] , “Selective Two-Photon Absorptive Resonance Femtosecond-Laser Electronic-Excitation Tagging Velocimetry,” Optics Letters, Vol. 41, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2225–2228. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.002225 OPLEDP 0146-9592
[22] , “Characterization of Dissociation and Gas Heating in Femtosecond Laser Plasma with Planar Rayleigh Scattering and Rayleigh Scattering Polarimetry,” 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2015-0932, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0932
[23] , “Modeling of the FLEET Filament Interaction with a Nonuniform Gas Flow,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2017-0257, 2017. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0257
[24] , “Application of FLEET Velocimetry in the NASA Langley 0.3-Meter Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” 31st AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, AIAA Paper 2015-2566, 2015. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-2566
[25] , “Femtosecond-Laser-Based Measurements of Velocity and Density in the NASA Langley 0.3-m Transonic Cryogenic Tunnel,” 32nd AIAA Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, AIAA Paper 2016-3246, 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-3246
[26] , “Femtosecond Laser Electronic Excitation Tagging Velocimetry in a Transonic, Cryogenic Wind Tunnel,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 55, No. 2, 2017, pp. 680–685. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J055325 AIAJAH 0001-1452
[27] , Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide, Springer, New York, 2007, Chap. 9.
[28] , “Velocity Profile Measurements in Hypersonic Flows Using Sequentially Imaged Fluorescence-Based Molecular Tagging,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 49, No. 9, 2011, pp. 1883–1896. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J050722 AIAJAH 0001-1452
[29] , “Simultaneous Velocimetry and Thermometry of Air by Use of Nonresonant Heterodyned Laser-Induced Thermal Acoustics,” Applied Optics, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2001, pp. 965–968. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.000965 APOPAI 0003-6935
[30] , “Iodine Tagging Velocimetry in a Mach 10 Wake,” AIAA Journal., Vol. 51, No. 7, 2013, pp. 1783–1786. doi:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052416 AIAJAH 0001-1452
[31] , “Krypton Tagging Velocimetry of an Underexpanded Jet,” Applied Optics, Vol. 54, No. 16, 2015, pp. 5094–5101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.54.005094 APOPAI 0003-6935

