Oblique Shock Control with Steady Flexible Panels
Abstract
Flexible panels deforming under pressure loads have been suggested as a passive form of adaptive oblique shock control. This study investigates oblique shock–boundary-layer interactions on a steady flexible panel in a Mach 2.0 flow. Experiments were performed in the Imperial College supersonic wind tunnel, where shock generators were used to produce an oblique shock followed by a corner expansion. A parametric study was conducted, exploring different shock impingement positions and shock–expansion distances. The steady aerostructural response is studied using schlieren photography, static pressure distributions, photogrammetry measurements, and surface oil flow visualization. Two-dimensional numerical simulations were performed to assess the effects of the flexible panel on downstream total pressure recovery. These were validated against experimental wall pressure distributions and measurements from a Pitot rake. Results show reductions in both separation length (of up to 40%) and stagnation pressure losses (of up to 10%) if the flexible plate is used. These improvements occur for a range of shock positions spanning approximately 50% of the panel length and for all the shock–expansion distances considered. A model that captures the flow physics responsible for these trends is proposed. The results highlight the potential of flexible panels for practical oblique shock control.
References
[1] , “Microramp Flow Control for Oblique Shock Interactions: Comparisons of Computational and Experimental Data,” 5th Flow Control Conference, AIAA Paper 2010-4973, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-4973
[2] , “Flow Control of an Oblique Shock Wave Reflection with Micro-Ramp Vortex Generators: Effects of Location and Size,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 26, No. 6, 2014, p. 066101. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4881941
[3] , “Control of Cowl Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction in Hypersonic Inlets by Bump,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, No. 11, 2015, pp. 3492–3496. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053974
[4] , “Interplay of Surface Deformation and Shock-Induced Separation in Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 55, No. 12, 2017, pp. 4258–4273. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J056030
[5] , “Control of Cowl-Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions by Deformable Shape-Memory Alloy Bump,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 57, No. 2, 2018, pp. 696–705. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j057409
[6] , “Oblique Shockwave Boundary Layer Interaction on a Flexible Surface,” AIAA SciTech 2019 Forum, AIAA Paper 2019-0097, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-0097
[7] , “A Novel Technique for Controlling Shock Strength of Laminar-Flow Aerofoil Sections,” Proceedings of the First European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, Vol. (92–01–022), Hamburg, Germany, 1992, pp. 175–183.
[8] , “Shock Control on a Swept Wing,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2000, pp. 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1270-9638(00)00128-0
[9] , “Three-Dimensional Shock Control Bumps: Effects of Geometry,” 52nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2014-0943, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-0943
[10] , “Aerodynamic Design of a Supersonic Inlet with a Parametric Bump,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2009, pp. 198–202. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.37416
[11] , “Review of Research into Shock Control Bumps,” Shock Waves, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2015, pp. 451–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00193-014-0533-4
[12] , “Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control Using Three-Dimensional Bumps for Transonic Wings,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 46, No. 6, 2008, pp. 1442–1452. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.32049
[13] , “Viscous and Inviscid Interactions of an Oblique Shock with a Flexible Panel,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 48, July 2014, pp. 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2014.02.003
[14] , “The Use of Actuated Flexible Plates for Adaptive Shock Control Bumps,” 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2015-1241, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-1241
[15] , “FSI Study of 2D Adaptive Shock Control Bumps,” AIAA SciTech 2019 Forum, AIAA Paper 2019-1845, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-1845
[16] , “Control of Transitional Shock Boundary Layer Interaction Using Surface Morphing,” AIAA SciTech 2019 Forum, AIAA Paper 2019-1895, 2019. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-1895
[17] , “Effect of Test Article Geometry on Shock Wave-Boundary Layer Interactions in Rectangular Intakes,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2017-0758, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0758
[18] , “Experimental Study of Fillets to Reduce Corner Effects in an Oblique Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction,” 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2015-1239, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-1239
[19] , “Effect of Confinement on Shock Wave-Boundary Layer Interactions in Rectangular Intakes,” 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2016-0348, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-0348
[20] , “Unsteadiness in Shock Wave Boundary Layer Interactions across Multiple Interaction Configurations,” 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2015-1977, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-1977
[21] , “Wind Tunnel Experiments with Flexible Plates in Transonic Flows,” 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2016-1553, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-1553
[22] , “Panel Flutter—A Review of the Aeroelastic Stability of Plates and Shells,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 8, No. 3, 1970, pp. 385–399. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.5680
[23] , “Photogrammetry for Accurate Model Deformation Measurement in a Supersonic Wind Tunnel,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2019, p. 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2652-7
[24] PhotoModeler Motion, PhotoModeler Technologies, Vancouver, Canada, 2019.
[25] , “A Two-Step Dewarping of Camera Document Images,” 2008 The Eighth IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems, IEEE, New York, 2008, pp. 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/das.2008.40
[26] , “Corner Effects in reflecting Oblique Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions,” 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA Paper 2013-859, 2013. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-859
[27] , “Corner Effect and Separation in Transonic Channel Flows,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 679, July 2011, pp. 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2011.135
[28] Star-CCM+, Siemens PLM Software, Plano, TX, 2018, Version 13.04.011.
[29] , “Characterizing and Improving Predictive Accuracy in Shock-Turbulent Boundary Layer Interactions Using Data-Driven Models,” 55th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2017-0314, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-0314
[30] , “Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing, and Development,” NASA TM 110446, 1997.
[31] , Boundary-Layer Theory, 7th ed., McGraw–Hill Book Company, New York, 1987, p. 599.
[32] , Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 5th ed., McGraw–Hill, New York, 2010, pp. 505–506.
[33] , “Lessons Learned from the 2010 AIAA Shock Boundary Layer Interaction Prediction Workshop,” 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2010-4825, 2010. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-4825