Skip to main content
Search
Search
Quick Search anywhere
Quick Search fdjslkfh
Advanced search
Cart
Join AIAA Institution Login
Skip main navigation
AIAA Journal logo
Skip to article control options
No AccessRegular Articles

Vortex Identification and Quantification on Blunt Trailing-Edge Rotor Blades in Reverse Flow

Published Online:2 Apr 2023https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J062576

Abstract

An inherent aerodynamic limitation of high-advance-ratio high-speed helicopters is reverse flow on the retreating blades, which can be a source of several unsteady effects, like vortex formation, that reduce rotor performance. The current study is the first detailed comparison of a rotor with a conventional, sharp trailing-edge NACA 0012 airfoil section with one equipped with a blunt-edge elliptical airfoil section. The aim was to detect and quantify vortex formation in reverse flow using planar particle image velocimetry on a subscale, low-Reynolds-number rotor rig in a water tank. The investigated blade azimuth angles ranged from 240 to 300 deg for advance ratios between 0.40 and 1.00 at pitch angles from 13 to 25 deg. Four main vortex structures were detected. At the aerodynamic leading edge, a strong interference of the tip vortex with the reverse-flow dynamic stall vortex was identified when blade flapping was restricted. Dynamic stall vortices advect closer to the blade surface for the blunt elliptical airfoil, thus reducing the wake area in reverse flow. Blade pitch kinematics govern the reverse-flow entrance-vortex strength and coherency. A coherent vortex street or wake sheet forms at the aerodynamic trailing edge of either airfoil. Overall, the vortex structures that form on the ellipse are more coherent than those on the NACA 0012. The current study highlights the significance of airfoil geometry, specifically the trailing-edge curvature, of an airfoil on the resulting vortex structures in reverse flow, strongly affecting the rotor performance at high advance ratios.

References

  • [1] Datta A., Yeo H. and Norman T. R., “Experimental Investigation and Fundamental Understanding of a Full-Scale Slowed Rotor at High Advance Ratios,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 58, No. 2, 2013, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.58.022004 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [2] Ewans J. and Krauss T., “Model Wind Tunnel Tests of a Reverse Velocity Rotor System,” Fairchild Industries TR AD0911537, Farmingdale NY, 1973. Google Scholar

  • [3] Leishman J. G., Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, 2nd ed., Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, U.K., 2006. Google Scholar

  • [4] Johnson W., Rotorcraft Aeromechanics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, U.K., 2013. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Lind A. H., Trollinger L. N., Manar F. H., Chopra I. and Jones A. R., “Flowfield Measurements of Reverse Flow on a High Advance Ratio Rotor,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 59, No. 12, 2018, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-018-2638-5 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [6] Wild O. D. and Jones A. R., “Reverse Flow Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Rotors with Blunt Trailing-Edged Blades at High Advance Ratios,” AIAA SciTech 2022 Forum, AIAA Paper 2022-1537, Jan. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2022-1537 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Smith L., Bauknecht A., Wang X., Lind A. and Jones A., “Three-Component Reverse Flow Measurements on a Mach-Scale Rotor at High Advance Ratios,” AHS International 74th Annual Forum & Technology Display, Vertical Flight Soc., Fairfax, VA, May 2018, pp. 1–11. Google Scholar

  • [8] Smith M. J., Liggett N. D. and Koukol B. C., “Aerodynamics of Airfoils at High and Reverse Angles of Attack,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2011, pp. 2012–2023. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031428 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Lind A. H., Lefebvre J. N. and Jones A. R., “Time-Averaged Aerodynamics of Sharp and Blunt Trailing-Edge Static Airfoils in Reverse Flow,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 52, No. 12, 2014, pp. 2751–2764. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J052967 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [10] Lind A. H. and Jones A. R., “Vortex Shedding from Airfoils in Reverse Flow,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 53, No. 9, 2015, pp. 2621–2633. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J053764 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Hodara J. and Smith M. J., “Improvement of Crossflow Aerodynamic Predictions for Forwarded Flight at All Advance Ratios,” 40th European Rotorcraft Forum, Sept. 2014, pp. 1–14. Google Scholar

  • [12] Lind A. H. and Jones A. R., “Unsteady Airloads on Static Airfoils Through High Angles of Attack and in Reverse Flow,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 63, May 2016, pp. 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.03.005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Lind A. H., Smith L. R., Milluzzo J. I. and Jones A. R., “Reynolds Number Effects on Rotor Blade Sections in Reverse Flow,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 53, No. 5, 2016, pp. 1248–1260. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C033556 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [14] Lind A. H. and Jones A. R., “Unsteady Aerodynamics of Reverse Flow Dynamic Stall on an Oscillating Blade Section,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 28, No. 7, 2016, Paper 077102. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4958334 Google Scholar

  • [15] Hodara J., Lind A. H., Jones A. R. and Smith M. J., “Collaborative Investigation of the Aerodynamic Behavior of Airfoils in Reverse Flow,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2016, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.61.032001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Pölzlbauer P., Desvigne D. and Breitsamter C., “Aerodynamic Design Optimization of a Helicopter Rotor Blade-Sleeve Fairing,” CEAS Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2019, pp. 665–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13272-018-0341-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Solis E., Bass T. A., Keith M. D., Oppenheim R. T., Runyon B. T. and Veras-Alba B., “RotCFD Analysis of the AH-56 Cheyenne Hub Drag,” NASA CR-2016-219395, 2016. Google Scholar

  • [18] Feil R., Rauleder J., Cameron C. G. and Sirohi J., “Aeromechanics Analysis of a High-Advance-Ratio Lift-Offset Coaxial Rotor System,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 56, No. 1, 2019, pp. 166–178. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C034748 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [19] Smith M. J., Lim J. W., van der Wall B. G., Baeder J. D., Biedron R. T., Boyd D. D., Jayaraman B., Jung S. N. and Min B.-Y., “An Assessment of CFD/CSD Prediction State-of-the-Art Using the HART II International Workshop Data,” 68th Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Vertical Flight Soc., Fairfax, VA, May 2012, pp. 1–41. Google Scholar

  • [20] Kumar S., Komp D., Hajek M. and Rauleder J., “Effect of Active Camber on Rotor Noise, Power and Hub Vibration,” AIAA SciTech 2021 Forum, AIAA Paper 2021-1927, Jan. 2021. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2021-1927 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [21] Yeo H., “Investigation of UH-60A Rotor Performance and Loads at High Advance Ratios,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 50, No. 2, 2013, pp. 576–589. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C031958 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [22] Yang Z., Sankar L. N., Smith M. J. and Bauchau O., “Recent Improvements to a Hybrid Method for Rotors in Forward Flight,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2002, pp. 804–812. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3000 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [23] de Montaudouin J., Reveles N. and Smith M. J., “Computational Aeroelastic Analysis of Slowed Rotors at High Advance Ratios,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 118, No. 1201, 2014, pp. 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000009131 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [24] Harris F. D., “Rotor Performance at High Advance Ratio: Theory Versus Test,” NASA CR-2008-215370, 2008. Google Scholar

  • [25] Charles B. D. and Tanner W. H., “Wind Tunnel Investigation of Semirigid Full-Scale Rotors Operating at High Advance Ratios,” Bell Helicopter Textron TR AD0684396, Fort Worth, TX, 1969. Google Scholar

  • [26] Bowen-Davies G. M. and Chopra I., “Performance and Loads Predictions of a Mach-Scaled Rotor at High Advance Ratios,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 61, No. 3, 2016, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.61.032008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [27] Berry B. and Chopra I., “Slowed Rotor Wind Tunnel Testing of an Instrumented Rotor at High Advance Ratio,” 40th European Rotorcraft Forum, Vol. 25, 2014, https://dspace-erf.nlr.nl/server/api/core/bitstreams/d41b4e41-d1e0-4599-bf3a-7ab18d1325f0/content. Google Scholar

  • [28] Potsdam M., Datta A. and Jayaraman B., “Computational Investigation and Fundamental Understanding of a Slowed UH-60A Rotor at High Advance Ratios,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2016, pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.61.022002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [29] Hiremath N., Shukla D., Raghav V. and Komerath N., “A Summary of the Flowfield Around a Rotor Blade in Reverse Flow,” American Helicopter Society 72nd Annual Forum, 2016, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Narayanan-Komerath/publication/303346642_A_SUMMARY_OF_THE_FLOWFIELD_AROUND_A_ROTOR_BLADE_IN_REVERSE_FLOW/links/573f25a108ae298602e8ec8d/A-SUMMARY-OF-THE-FLOWFIELD-AROUND-A-ROTOR-BLADE-IN-REVERSE-FLOW.pdf. Google Scholar

  • [30] Jeong J. and Hussain F., “On the Identification of a Vortex,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 285, Feb. 1995, pp. 69–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112095000462 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [31] Graftieaux L., Michard M. and Grosjean N., “Combining PIV, POD and Vortex Identification Algorithms for the Study of Unsteady Turbulent Swirling Flows,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 12, No. 9, 2001, p. 1422. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/12/9/307 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [32] van der Wall B. G. and Richard H., “Analysis Methodology for 3C-PIV Data of Rotary Wing Vortices,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 40, No. 5, 2006, pp. 798–812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-006-0117-x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [33] Kindler K., Mulleners K., Richard H., van der Wall B. G. and Raffel M., “Aperiodicity in the Near Field of Full-Scale Rotor Blade Tip Vortices,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 50, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1601–1610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-010-1016-8 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [34] Bagai A., “Aerodynamic Design of the X2 Technology Demonstrator™ Main Rotor Blade,” Annual Forum of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 64, Vertical Flight Soc., Fairfax, VA, 2008, p. 29. Google Scholar

  • [35] Han S.-Q., Song W.-P., Han Z.-H., Li S.-B. and Lin Y.-F., “Hybrid Inverse/Optimization Design Method for Rigid Coaxial Rotor Airfoils Considering Reverse Flow,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 95, Dec. 2019, Paper 105488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2019.105488 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [36] Davis J. M., Saei M., Mohanty D. P., Udupa A., Sugihara T. and Chandrasekar S., “Cutting of Tantalum: Why It Is so Difficult and What Can Be Done About It,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 157, Oct. 2020, Paper 103607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103607 Google Scholar

  • [37] Feil R., Hajek M. and Rauleder J., “Vibratory Load Predictions of a High-Advance-Ratio Coaxial Rotor System Validated by Wind Tunnel Tests,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 92, Jan. 2020, Paper 102764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102764 Google Scholar

  • [38] Wild O. D., Murphy M. J. and Jones A. R., “Comparison of Instantaneous Aerodynamic Loads on Sharp and Blunt Trailing-Edged Blades of High Advance Ratio Rotors,” AIAA SciTech 2023 Forum, AIAA Paper 2023-2466, March 2023. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2023-2466 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [39] Schlueter K. and Jones A., “The Effects of Wall Boundaries on the Flow Field of a Rotating Wing,” 30th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA Paper 2012-2776, Sept. 2012. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-2776 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [40] Leishman J. G., “Challenges in Modelling the Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines,” Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology, Vol. 5, Nos. 2–3, 2002, pp. 85–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.62 Google Scholar

  • [41] Wieneke B., “PIV Uncertainty Quantification from Correlation Statistics,” Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 26, No. 7, 2015, Paper 074002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/26/7/074002 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [42] Ham N. D., “Some Conclusions from an Investigation of Blade-Vortex Interaction,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 20, No. 4, 1975, pp. 26–31. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.20.26 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [43] Burtsev A., He W., Zhang K., Theofilis V., Taira K. and Amitay M., “Linear Modal Instabilities Around Post-Stall Swept Finite Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 944, Aug. 2022, p. A6. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2022.420 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [44] Simoni D., Ubaldi M. and Zunino P., “A Simplified Model Predicting the Kelvin–Helmholtz Instability Frequency for Laminar Separated Flows,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 138, No. 4, 2016, Paper 044501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032162 Google Scholar

  • [45] Ramasamy M. and Leishman J. G., “Interdependence of Diffusion and Straining of Helicopter Blade Tip Vortices,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2004, pp. 1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.3364 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [46] Leonard A., “Vortex Methods for Flow Simulation,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1980, pp. 289–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(80)90040-6 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [47] Saffman P. G., Vortex Dynamics, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, England, U.K., 1995. Google Scholar

Previous article
Next article