Skip to main content
Skip to article control options
No AccessRegular Articles

Flutter and Limit-Cycle Oscillations of a Panel Using Unsteady Potential Flow Aerodynamics

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J062943

The potential aerodynamic theory is implemented to model the flow over a flexible panel. The present study compares the more complete unsteady version of the potential flow theory with its simplification known as the linear piston theory for different Mach numbers and the two- and three-dimensional aerodynamic models. The piston theory is “local” in space and time because it assumes the pressure at a spatial point and time only depends on the panel deformation at the same point and time. The full potential flow model includes the effect of the past history of the panel deformation and the spatial distribution of the panel deformation on the pressure at any instant in time and at any point in space. Aeroelastic analysis is made to trace the flutter onset critical condition based on the limit cycle oscillation amplitudes, and the results are compared with the more traditional implementation using piston theory. Conclusions are made based on the use and application of this more complete aerodynamic theory, particularly for near-transonic and hypersonic flow regimes. Subsonic results are also presented in this study.

References

  • [1] Bismarck-Nasr M. N., “Finite Elements in Aeroelasticity of Plates and Shells,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 49, No. 10S, 1996, pp. S17–S24.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3101970 Google Scholar

  • [2] Marzocca P., Fazelzadeh S. A. and Hosseini M., “A Review of Nonlinear Aero-Thermo-Elasticity of Functionally Graded Panels,” Journal of Thermal Stresses, Vol. 34, Nos. 5–6, 2011, pp. 536–568.https://doi.org/10.1080/01495739.2011.564016 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [3] Mei C., Abdel-Motagaly K. and Chen R., “Review of Nonlinear Panel Flutter at Supersonic and Hypersonic Speeds,” Applied Mechanics Reviews, Vol. 52, No. 10, 1999, pp. 321–332.https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3098919 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [4] Freydin M., Dowell E. H., Spottswood S. M. and Perez R. A., “Nonlinear Dynamics and Flutter of Plate and Cavity in Response to Supersonic Wind Tunnel Start,” Nonlinear Dynamics, Vol. 103, No. 4, 2021, pp. 3019–3036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-020-05817-x CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [5] Freydin M., Dowell E. H., Currao G. M. D. and Neely A. J., “Computational Study for the Design of a Hypersonic Panel Flutter Experiment,” Paper Presented at International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics, IFASD, Savannah, 2019. Google Scholar

  • [6] Freydin M. and Dowell E. H., “Nonlinear Theoretical Aeroelastic Model of a Plate: Free to Fixed In-Plane Boundaries,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 59, No. 2, 2021, pp. 658–672. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J059551 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [7] Freydin M., Dowell E. H., Whalen T. J. and Laurence S. J., “A Theoretical Computational Model of a Plate in Hypersonic Flow,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 93, Feb. 2020, Paper 102858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2019.102858 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [8] Freydin M. and Dowell E. H., “Fully Coupled Nonlinear Aerothermoelastic Computational Model of a Plate in Hypersonic Flow,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 59, No. 7, 2021, pp. 2725–2736. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060085 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [9] Kappus H. P., Lemley C. E. and Zimmerman N. H., “An Experimental Investigation of High Amplitude Panel Flutter,” NASA CR 1837, 1971. Google Scholar

  • [10] Ventres C. S. and Dowell E. H., “Comparison of Theory and Experiment for Nonlinear Flutter of Loaded Plates,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 8, No. 11, 1970, pp. 2022–2030. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.6041 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [11] Currao G. M. D., Freydin M., Dowell E. H., McQuellin L. P. and Neely A. J., “Design of a Panel Flutter Experiment in a Short Duration Hypersonic Facility,” Proceedings of the 21st Australasian Fluid Mechanics Conference, AFMC 2018, edited by Lau T. and Kelso R., Australasian Fluid Mechanics Soc., Adelaide, Australia, 2018. Google Scholar

  • [12] Spottswood S. M., Beberniss T. J., Eason T. G., Perez R. A., Donbar J. M., Ehrhardt D. A. and Riley Z. B., “Exploring the Response of a Thin, Flexible Panel to Shock-Turbulent Boundary-Layer Interactions,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, Vol. 443, March 2019, pp. 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2018.11.035 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [13] Akhavan H. and Ribeiro P., “Nonlinear Flutter of Composite Laminates with Curvilinear Fibres Using a Full Linearized Aerodynamic Theory,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, Vol. 115, Nov. 2022, Paper 103756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2022.103756 Google Scholar

  • [14] Dowell E. H., “Nonlinear Oscillations of a Fluttering Plate. II,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 5, No. 10, 1967, pp. 1856–1862. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.4316 LinkGoogle Scholar

  • [15] Dowell E. H., Aeroelasticity of Plates and Shells, Noordhoff International, Leyden, The Netherlands, 1975, Chap. 4. CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [16] Dowell E. H., “Generalized Aerodynamic Forces on a Flexible Plate Undergoing Transient Motion,” Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1967, pp. 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/99912 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • [17] Leissa A. W., “Vibration of Plates,” NASA Rept. SP-160, 1969. Google Scholar

  • [18] Brouwer K. R., Perez R. A., Beberniss T. J., Spottswood S. M. and Ehrhardt D. A., “Experiments on a Thin Panel Excited by Turbulent Flow and Shock/Boundary-Layer Interactions,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 59, No. 7, 2021, pp. 2737–2752. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.J060114 LinkGoogle Scholar